NEW FUTURE MARKET
  • Confirmed: Ford to sell Volvo to China’s Geely

    By Andrew Ganz - Posted December 23rd 2009

    After numerous reports out of both Gothenburg, Sweden, and Dearborn, Michigan, Ford Motor Company confirmed that it has reached conclusive sale terms for its Volvo luxury car unit with Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Company Limited.
    Ford and Geely say they hope for a “definitive sale agreement” to be signed in the first quarter of 2010. The automakers say that all internal hurdles have been tackled and that the deal awaits only final documentation, financing details and government approvals. Analysts say that few challenges remain.

    Ford says that it will continue to work with Volvo on certain levels even after the sale, although the automaker did not elaborate on its plans. Ford will not continue to hold any share in Volvo after the sale.

    Volvo is the last remaining brand in Ford’s ill-fated Premier Automotive Group portfolio, which once included Jaguar, Aston Martin and Land Rover. The automaker says it is now concentrating on just its three core brands, Ford, Lincoln and Mercury, although the future of the latter is also in doubt.

    The sale of Volvo marks a turning point for Ford, Sweden and China. It officially concludes Ford’s expansion efforts under former leader Jacques Nasser, it sends Sweden’s already crumbling auto industry into further disarray and it means that substantial first rate safety, engineering and assembly technology will now be directly available to a Chinese automaker for the first time.

    41 COMMENTS

    1. photo
      silviumc218 days ago

      Ford and GM will cry sour tears in 3-5 years when they’ll have to deal with cheap Chinese cars on the american market.

      You don’t sell technology to one single Chinese company, you sell it to all China.

    2. photo
      F50218 days ago

      Bad move, like the above poster said, we’ll probably see cheap-arse Geely’s based on old and proven Volvo parts here in the USA….. If Volvo designers also go hopefully they might design some you know….. original Geely’s….

    3. photo
      volo218 days ago

      Deserve you right Sweden!
      when Renault wanted to buy Volvo in the 90s, everyone in Sweden was against, and ford bought it. Now that Ford depleted Volvo, the business goes to China.
      In the meantime, Renault-Nissan is doing OK

      Haha, I laugh

    4. photo
      DB9218 days ago

      I hope that Volvo is able to function with some degree of autonomy and that they can continue to refine and expand the brand. While I was in the market for an XC60 type vehicle I still haven’t decided. The Chinese are not stupid; they won’t destroy what they have just bought. However, as many have indicated, this purchase advances Geely automotive ten to fifteen years in product development capability – what a deal just $2 Billion, Ford paid $6.45 Billion in 1999.

      Well, I guess we can look at it this way: If not for Jack Nasser many of the World’s great automotive Marques would in all likelihood not be around, Jaguar, Land Rover, Aston Martin and Volvo. At least when Ford sold them they were in better shape than when they were bought ; although it should be added, at the expense of Ford’s core Brand. GM, on the other hand, has a penchant for destroying/impairing anything that it touches, e.g., see Lotus and Saab.

      At this point, especially if you’re a fan of the Brand, it’s hard to say whether to be happy, sad or indifferent in reaction to the conclusion of the deal. Good luck to Volvo. Ford, I hope you know what you’re doing, Volvo wasn’t a large drain on your resources; sales/revenue were trending up. The Brand was close to profitability.

      DB9;-)

    5. photo
      Borat218 days ago

      First time in years I saw some resemblance of humor and creativity on LLN. I love the flag in the image. LLN hired some new intern with sense of humor or someone got a bit much to drink over holiday party?

    6. photo
      03T4R218 days ago

      At least Ford can sell their brands, unlike GM. Ford should do away with Mercury as well, they’re just re-badged Fords.

    7. photo
      daiso218 days ago

      After chinese company get the technology they wanted, All volvo/saab workers in sweden will layoffs.
      After chinese company get volvo/saab technology, Chinese company kill US auto industry by cheap price volvo/saab copies.

      intellectual property? China is a big country. Sweden goverment and Ford/GM can NOT do anything against to China.
      If China company violate intellectual property, and copy their technology, However, There is NO way to protest to China.
      Because Geely, BAIC, these China state owned companies backing up by Chinese PRC goverment.

    8. photo
      mitzo218 days ago

      Both Ford and GM went on a bit of a spree back when, drunk on truck money, they set to buying up international brands they had no clue about, frigging them up, then dumping them at a loss later. Guilty of major crimes against the auto industry.

    9. photo
      85ZingoGTR218 days ago

      Im keeping my fingers crossed. Hopefully Geely will do like TATA and improve the Volvo brand. Yes. Im actually giving them a chance to prove themselves worthy of the American auto industry being our domestic brands don’t deserve it!! except Ford.

    10. photo
      twintornados218 days ago

      Thank god that Volvo will soon be gone from Ford. Ford spent way too much time and money on the line. Yes, they got some good safety equipment, but at what cost. Geely will use Volvo to generate sales within China, the newest and largest automotive market. US market share is not as important to them. Volvo will remain a minor player in the North American market place.

      Now, Ford will have no excuse not to invest in the Ford, Lincoln, and Mercury brands.

    11. photo
      Architect218 days ago

      Well, it’s been a long fall from the Ford Premier Auto Group (PAG). I still don’t quite follow why Ford would not hold onto at least this one, semi-luxury marque.

      p.s. 85ZingoGTR…um…TATA hasn’t fundamentally done anything for Jaguar! They haven’t had them that long. The great product you see from Jaguar now was done under Ford’s leadership.

    12. photo
      85ZingoGTR218 days ago

      @ Architect – Well I mean they have high hopes for them. Don’t forget some of these companies utilize these iconic brands to improve their own. (Or bring it down like GM did with SAAB and Chrysler almost did with Mercedes-Benz) Which is why Im keeping the fingers crossed. From what I understand, Geely tried to come into the US. I remember them at the NY Auto show. They failed their entry because they failed to pass the NHTSA crash tests. Maybe its a good opportunity for them and do what Ford did and improve their own cars by using their safety technology in an attempt to enter the US.

    13. photo
      Veda218 days ago

      Why the hate? Cheap chinese made cars at Walmart with first rate safety? I’d say go for it.

    14. photo
      Lionwithoutpride218 days ago

      With this sale, Ford has just undone almost everything they’ve accomplished in their turnaround. Ford is back where it was in 2005, but with a whole lot less to borrow against. They’ve got a good lineup now, but I’m not so bullish on how focused their engineers are on safety. Anyone who follows Ford knows that their recent accolades for safety are, largely, attributable to Volvo. Will their engineers continue to innovate safety technology? They are, no doubt, capable, but, ten years ago, all we thought about Ford’s safety could be summed up with: Fires and tire blowouts. Please prove me wrong Ford. You’ve earned some credibility, but I really feel like you’re stretching it with this sale.

    15. photo
      idrinorbarsaku218 days ago

      03T4R,
      GM should do away with caddy/buick/gmc, they are just rebadged chevrolets!

    16. photo
      reedfast218 days ago

      here it is again, LLN, can you please tell me what “audi, bmw, veyron, bmw, and concept” are doing in the explore top stories board, that’s a bit ridiculous.

    17. photo
      ThePatriot218 days ago

      We in the West must not and will not allow China to acquire Volvo.

      I suggest we use the great might of the combined economic and military forces of the West to teach them a lesson once and for all. We will at the very least need to keep their industries planted in the third world where they deservedly belong. The Holy Book demands it.

    18. photo
      Lionwithoutpride218 days ago

      Veda-

      Why hate? I really don’t think that most posters hate Ford, Geely or the Chinese people. It all comes down to whether you think it’s more beneficial to have cheap products that stretch U.S. workers’ salaries further, or American jobs, corporate profits and manufacturing know-how. The know-how, especially, comes in handy for things like large-scale wars that require national mobilization. A lot of folks don’t think that there will ever be wars like that again, but one can point to numerous periods in Western history in which large-scale wars did not occur. They have always returned. Some believe that nuclear weapons, through M.A.D., have changed this paradigm. Others point to the abundance of anti-ballistic missile programs and say that’s simply no longer assured. I tend to believe that nations that make things are powerful. This is an admittedly pessimistic view, but it is premised upon the notion that there are winners and losers. Then again, I live in a nation that gives trophies for showing up . . .

    19. photo
      johnnycanuck218 days ago

      Reports are just now coming out of Sweden that IKEA is attempting a takeover of Wal-Mart as a means of retaliation.

    20. photo
      whinelikeaturbine218 days ago

      Ford going to sell Volvo to China’s Geely?! It strongly feels like a JLR-Tata scenario……

    21. photo
      ICEMAN218 days ago

      “Reports are just now coming out of Sweden that IKEA is attempting a takeover of Wal-Mart as a means of retaliation”

      Elin Woods already started the process by swinging a golf club, go SWEDES!

    22. photo
      JakeK66218 days ago

      I guess I should have someone else start my Volvo this afternoon Johnny.

    23. photo
      One-77218 days ago

      wow Ford is stupid as fu ck too!

    24. photo
      TOZO218 days ago

      Again…bad move.

    25. photo
      mugengsr218 days ago

      It”ll be interesting to see how Volvo turns out.

    26. photo
      Borat218 days ago

      veda, have you heard of Chinese sheet rock walls or dog food? I personally can’t imagine safe cars coming from that part of the world. BTW, it is not the people or the culture per say, it is communist system at fault. Yes, China is a communist country. Check Wikipedia.

    27. photo
      veeride218 days ago

      this is a bad move, make my words, giving china access to safe automobile technology is a bad move! first they will move east to eastern europe, then to normal europe… then to mexico, then to Canada and US…. kiss more jobs good bye! unless our master obama can convince the lawmakers to do the same as the chinese do to us, have them partner with an american manufacturer and have the cars made here in the states!

      thats the only way to get this not to be a catastrophe!

    28. photo
      daiso218 days ago

      And geely already decide Volvo facotry shift to China.

      Volvo workers and sweden have no merit.

      Perhpas, The volvo brand will selling well in China. (like lenovo pc), however, all of its profits belong to China and Chinese volvo factory. Volvo sweden worker waiting doomsday. After Chinese copy volvo technology, Chinese don’t need Volvo sweden workers.

    29. photo
      Darren Donnellan218 days ago

      Give me a break, everyone seems to be able to tell the future on this. If it wasn’t for Ford, Volvo would be long gone. Let’s hope Geely make’s Volvo their core brand and let’s them contuine on the path their on.

    30. photo
      daiso218 days ago

      Chinese company toally ignoring intellectual property. Even Chinese goverement promote ‘Shanzhai ;山寨’ (copycat) culture.
      For avoiding import, Chinese goverment indirectly promote Chinese copycat products. The Chinese iphone clone is this example. Cause this Chinese Shanzhai, Apple’s iphone is not success in China.

      Cheap price volvo copies will dominate Chinese market, later Cheap price volvo copies kill US auto industry.

      The Japan and EU are smart. Maybe they will protect their market from Chinese invasions. However, US should worry.

    31. photo
      masteryoda83218 days ago

      this is going to be interesting. However I am excited to see the domestic companies being able to recognize when being to big just for the hell of it can bite one’s ass. Ford and GM are going to focus their efforts on fewer marques and continue to make world class vehicles.

    32. photo
      peter g218 days ago

      Well…The Times They Are a-Changin…But in a few years cheap Volvos will be everywhere, copies or not, and consumers will always chose the cheaper solution…

    33. photo
      tHeWasTeDYouTh218 days ago

      “Why the hate? Cheap chinese made cars at Walmart with first rate safety? I’d say go for it”

      You should get an award for this comment, when the Chinese get their chance they will flood the US with cheap cars, GM, Ford and Chrysler are done for in the near future

    34. photo
      leftwingagenda218 days ago

      good move for ford, and the stock market approves, with the share price crossing the 10 dollar barrier today…ford is leaner and meaner having done this and the “this will come back to haunt ford” conspiracy theorists need another layer on their tinfoil hats…

      about 12 months ago, if you had put 10k into ford shares, you’d have 50k in stock now…not a bad return, considering the economy and all…

    35. photo
      steve333218 days ago

      >I hope that Volvo is able to function with some degree of autonomy and that they can continue to refine and expand the brand. While I was in the market for an XC60 type vehicle I still haven’t decided. The Chinese are not stupid; they won’t destroy what they have just bought.<

      When a Chinese company bought the rights to Pyrex from Corning they changed the formula because it was cheaper and then they started exploding at high temperature!
      Anyone who buys a vehicle from a Chinese owned car company is a moron. Period.

    36. photo
      KarLoveBoy88218 days ago

      Oh sh!t. Volvo is toast now. Of all the other companies and all the other countries in the world, why the Chinese? This saddens me painfully.

    37. photo
      Lionwithoutpride218 days ago

      leftwingagenda-

      I’ve focused my studies on China since I was 14 and started taking Chinese language and history courses. I moved on to study their culture and politics. I’ve spent time in China. I’ve also watched time-and-time again as various intellectual property cases went before the Chinese courts. I think my favorite example is New Balance. You should google their i.p. cases in China. Most Americans don’t even realize that an unknown, but, according to New Balance, significant, number of “New Balance” shoes sold in America are 3rd shift or the products of a Chinese competitor that simply lifted New Balance designs. New Balance is not seeing the profits. From family members, who work for companies like Coach, I know that they are desperate for cheap labor, but they are also quite scared about their low-cost Chinese competitors that have spun off of Coach sans permission from Coach.

      I bet that you never thought Toyota or Hyundai would grow into massive headaches for Detroit. Or, if you did, then why can’t you see how a Chinese company could do the same and to even more devastating effect? Are you one of those nativists who doesn’t believe the Chinese have the mental or industrial capacity to do so? I doubt it. Yet you’re sitting there telling me that a $2 billion return on a $6 billion investment is acceptable when Ford’s short-term debt is somewhere around $23 billion and their long-term debt is something like $124 billion. There are other sources of capital and Ford has shown that they have earned credibility with their lenders who renegotiated payment dates PRIOR to final word on Ford selling Volvo.

      Now, don’t get all preachy on the stocks point. You’re one of the posters that reminded us almost daily, over the past year, that greed on Wall Street was to blame for our woes. So, I fail to see how you can now anoint the performance of Ford’s stock. Moreover, how many times have folks on Wall Street celebrated the wrong moves? Wall Street strongly approved of Cerberus’ acquisition of Chrysler. The point is, unless you can tell posters what Ford should/could do 10-20 years from now to compete with cheap Chinese autos entering the U.S. then you cannot tell us to not worry. About the only solution I see for Ford is to offshore more jobs. And by the way, did you invest $10,000 in Ford stock and make a killing? If not then I can only assume you didn’t believe it was a good investment for $10,000 9 months ago. You may have bought a few shares, but you didn’t sell your car or dip into savings to raise that $10,000. I guess your crystal-ball is as cloudy as the rest of ours. Or maybe you did buy the shares and I’m an idiot.

      One final thought, can you name ANY American-owned television company? I’ll give you a hint, the last one was Zenith and they collapsed more than a decade ago. And it all started with the licensing of transistor technology to Japan to make radios post-WWII. Americans are unwilling to accept market-competitive wages. The end result is that the only jobs we can’t offshore are the service sector jobs that require stores to be manned in the U.S. or service-visits to homes. In your world, America owns less and builds less, but somehow competes by working in service-sector jobs? Meanwhile, fewer and fewer Americans are paying taxes. 47% of Americans will pay NO income tax for 2009. Does it sound like these sort of deals have been good for America? I really hope you’re right. I promise that, under it all, I’m an optimist. I don’t believe you can ever count out the American people. That said, we differ on how to keep the U.S. strong. Merry Christmas leftwing!

    38. photo
      A4218 days ago

      Looks like my family’s recent 3rd Volvo purchase in the last 21 years will be our last.
      This world is going to hell in a handbasket.

    39. photo
      A4218 days ago

      peter g – the majority of uneducated automotive consumers out there most often look at one major fact of car buying: safety. They scour consumer reports and consult crash test ratings and ultimately buy the SAFEST car they can at the most affordable price. Just because smart cars are cheap, are they flying off dealer lots? No, they arent. And those are way safer than anything coming out of China right now. Just wait til the average American automotive consumer takes a peek at the safety ratings (or lack there of) on a Chinese car.

    40. photo
      swamprat216 days ago

      @Lionwithoutpride

      Given your inclination towards offering problems without solutions, I hope that you end up in a Chinese Gulag, howling the loudest in your Mandarin Chinese tongue that you have developed since the age of 14. The US is in trouble because of our government’s abandonment of protectionist policies that kept industry here in the United States. Japan and China practice market protections with great success.Furthermore, in China, wages are suppressed by an authoritarian government that doesn’t allow collective bargaining of any kind and one that suppresses freedom of speech and other rights we take for granted (but are under increasing attack in the United States.) One would have to be deaf, dumb and blind not to see that freeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee trade hasn’t resulted in a train wreck for this once great country. $900 billion annual trade deficits for a decade, loans from the Chinese, are the direct results of freeeeeeeee trade policies and nothing more. The fact is, you can’t compete with slave labor no matter how well educated and “competitive” our population. Free trade and those who support it is nonsense in the real world. We have been surviving on foreign loans and our past wealth for too long. It is time to slam the door shut on these companies who willingly gave away our technology and manufacturing to others. It is time to slam the door shut on free trade and its disciples. Free trade belongs in a radioactive landfill. http://www.economyincrisis.org

    41. photo
      Sanandraes2004213 days ago

      One of the last things holding up this deal is the issue of intellectual property rights. Because Volvo has been almost completely integrated into the rest of Ford, this potential sale will require Ford to enter into a full partnership with Geely that can last for many years after the sale is completed. If there is no partnership Volvo’s platforms will instantly switch over to Geely’s current platforms immediately after the sale is completed! This will result in the entire lineup of Volvo becoming badge badge engineered Geelys the minute this sale is completed!

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

  • REVIEW:

  • FEATURES:

  • SPECS:

  • SAFETY:

  • PRICING:


Recently Commented

  • Mark KleisThanks for the feedback jayjc08 - we do this for you guys. We'll try and
  • Mark KleisHow very weird, I must have missed that in the presentation they gave us. Good
  • saabaru1LeftLane has every right to limit links, they are not here to spread the love
  • jayjc08Very good article. I'm really liking the contrast between Marks more factual articles and Jacks
  • Welty RoundelI wished him well on the last post, (and was sincere) How many well wishes