




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: USA Today comes to defense of Buick, new Lucerne</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 00:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Za</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html#comment-2713</link>
		<dc:creator>Za</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/27/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne/#comment-2713</guid>
		<description>First off, the Lucerne seems typical of the modern day, aside from the gorgeous Enclave, in representing an understated attempt at luxury. It is not supposed to have the *bling*bling* of the Cadillacs while still maintaining a high level of refinement. Most recent Buicks have failed at this-the Lucerne is refreshing in that it is a decent car. I would personally not drive one, but I could easily see many 50somethings buying the car.

However, the article was atrocious. I don&#039;t know what James Healy was thinking, but most of his comments came off as personal attacks on other manufacturers. Furthermore, some of his statements make me rather skeptical of his credentials.

&quot;There&#039;s even a sports Lucerne model, CXS, that has bigger wheels, tires and brakes than the others and a firmer suspension for more agile handling.

One trade-off of the big wheels is a 44-foot turning circle diameter, as big as a full-size pickup. That makes it clumsy in some parking lots. &quot;

To put it bluntly, the hell is he smoking? Sinc when did the wheel diameter affect turning radius? Am I missing something here?

Lastly, although they most definitely cater to a similar crowd, I highly doubt many Lexus or Mercedes shoppers will be swayed by the Buick. I would still take the ES330 if I wanted a cloud cruiser.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First off, the Lucerne seems typical of the modern day, aside from the gorgeous Enclave, in representing an understated attempt at luxury. It is not supposed to have the *bling*bling* of the Cadillacs while still maintaining a high level of refinement. Most recent Buicks have failed at this-the Lucerne is refreshing in that it is a decent car. I would personally not drive one, but I could easily see many 50somethings buying the car.</p>
<p>However, the article was atrocious. I don&#8217;t know what James Healy was thinking, but most of his comments came off as personal attacks on other manufacturers. Furthermore, some of his statements make me rather skeptical of his credentials.</p>
<p>&#8220;There&#8217;s even a sports Lucerne model, CXS, that has bigger wheels, tires and brakes than the others and a firmer suspension for more agile handling.</p>
<p>One trade-off of the big wheels is a 44-foot turning circle diameter, as big as a full-size pickup. That makes it clumsy in some parking lots. &#8221;</p>
<p>To put it bluntly, the hell is he smoking? Sinc when did the wheel diameter affect turning radius? Am I missing something here?</p>
<p>Lastly, although they most definitely cater to a similar crowd, I highly doubt many Lexus or Mercedes shoppers will be swayed by the Buick. I would still take the ES330 if I wanted a cloud cruiser.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angel Rivera</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html#comment-2676</link>
		<dc:creator>Angel Rivera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 07:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/27/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne/#comment-2676</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t USA Today written for people with a 3rd-grade level of education?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t USA Today written for people with a 3rd-grade level of education?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html#comment-2673</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 05:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/27/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne/#comment-2673</guid>
		<description>Lucerne.... is that not the name of the Safeway supermarket in-house cheap brands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lucerne&#8230;. is that not the name of the Safeway supermarket in-house cheap brands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne.html#comment-2666</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:01:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/01/27/usa-today-comes-to-defense-of-buick-new-lucerne/#comment-2666</guid>
		<description>that guy has no taste...im sure it is a fine vehicle but it looks like it could have been produced in the mid eighties...boring.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that guy has no taste&#8230;im sure it is a fine vehicle but it looks like it could have been produced in the mid eighties&#8230;boring.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.008 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 199/200 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 19:19:19 -->
