Comments on: Video: Dodge Avenger Concept

By: 1952 MG TD

1952 MG TD — Fri, 22 Sep 2006 12:49:45 +0000

Shakira, I’m still here… I just left my old job, got a new one… so I, unfortunately for you, will not be spending NEARLY as much time on here.

but I AM still here…

By: Hyperion

Hyperion — Thu, 21 Sep 2006 02:43:08 +0000

All they have to do is build a small rear wheel drive sedan or coupe under $20k with a V-6. Why is this so difficult?

I would never buy this thing. I will never buy a FWD Mitsu Eclipse. I will never buy a sport FWD car of any type unless it weighs 2600lbs or less.

Automakers need to make money, I guess. I just wish they’d still build respectable cars for those of us who know what we’re looking for and don’t have a lot to spend and refuse to compromise on a purchase.

By: sampson

sampson — Thu, 21 Sep 2006 01:11:58 +0000

oh great… another damn sedan…

By: bacalao

bacalao — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:49:48 +0000

caliber front charger back….. sorry but ive seen these before

By: Stuart

Stuart — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 23:27:16 +0000

It the same as the sebring which is front wheel drive

By: Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson

Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 21:26:48 +0000

Its still FWD

By: oZ

oZ — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 20:40:13 +0000

Bonquisha: Read up before speaking. The replacement for the Sebring and Avenger was going to be on the new Galant platform, but that was abandoned. This is a Chrysler platform.

By: Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson

Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:43:10 +0000

of course it is FWD its a mitsubishi platform

By: Hyperion

Hyperion — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:14:46 +0000

My ONLY question: is it front wheel drive? If not, then super for Dodge for giving a sporting vehicle what it needs to back up it’s styling.

By: Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson

Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 19:09:01 +0000

I’m going to figure out which one of you 1952 MG TD has morphed into, but as yet the responses have not been tongue way up DCXs ass enough to give him away

By: TimG

TimG — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:43:41 +0000

I agree.
Some don’t like the in-your-face styling, but it sure gets your attention. RAH!

By: Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson

Bonquisha Sheneequah Sharkeesha Shi-thead Jackson — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 17:39:40 +0000

Plymouth Cricket 2

By: Stuart

Stuart — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 16:50:59 +0000

Smart move by Dodge. The car intensionally resemble a mini charger which is a nice looking car anyway. Seeing as the charger is unavailable to the europeans, this will be like original design to us so should sell well compared to the class standards such as the Passats, Mondeo and Vectra’s on looks alone (The accords and toyota avensis are regarded as Pieces Of Shits in europe because thats what they really are).

Dodge probably plans to change the Charger significantly on the next generation hopefully to resemble the concept of the late 90′s.

By: gumby

gumby — Wed, 20 Sep 2006 15:31:00 +0000

why does dodge continue with its boxy styling? and why does the avenger so closely resemble a miniaturized charger? one thing is for sure, dodge’s styling is unique