RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Video: Electric car races Ferrari, Porsche — and wins (updated!)

05/05/2006, 4:09 PM

By admin

The Wrightspeed X1 has been getting a lot of media attention lately, with an increased interest in alternative energy amid high fuel prices. While this is not the most efficient application of electric car technology, it is most certainly the coolest. The X1’s lithium batteries give it a 150 mile range. It can hit 60 mph in just 3 seconds — that’s faster than just about anything out there, less the $1.3 million Bugatti Veyron. It’s faster than a Mercedes SLR, Corvette Z06, or Ferrari Enzo. It’s also a heck of a lot faster than a Ferrari 360 Modena or Porsche Carerra GT, which it is shown racing in the video after the jump…

Below is another (older) video of the car in testing:

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

05/05, 4:11 PM

posted by:

Shut Up

Looks just like Ariel Atom

05/05, 4:36 PM

posted by:

gsh

um, i want one?

05/05, 4:38 PM

posted by:

junkie

This is like comparing a motorcycle to a car, then proclaiming that the motorcycle wins because it’s faster and gets better MPG.

Put the electric drivetrain into an otherwise identical vehicle, then make the comparison.

BTW – it IS an Ariel Atom, with an electric drivetrain.

05/05, 4:53 PM

posted by:

Latvietis

It’s so fast becouse it hasn’t got any weight at all.

05/05, 4:54 PM

posted by:

Sean

The Ariel Atom isnt as practical in daily use as a regular supercar for obvious reasons, but not only that people forget that supercars are about speeds excessive over 200mph and superior handling. While the Ariel Atom can handle the latter amazingly, throwing an electric drivetrain would probably spoil the handling,and not only that it cant touch a Ferrari at the top end.

05/05, 5:02 PM

posted by:

g unit

now this is one elec car i wouldnt mind to own

05/05, 5:10 PM

posted by:

Phil McCrackin

“It’s so fast becouse it hasn’t got any weight at all.”

Not to mention it lacks doors, roof, intterior room, ventilation system beyond the outside air, windshield or any other glass, safety equipment, etc.

05/05, 5:43 PM

posted by:

P Phunk

Aside from sparse weight, electric motors have extreme amounts of torque from 0 RPM.

05/05, 5:45 PM

posted by:

Ahk-Med

“It’s fast becuase its lite.” Wow, what a amazing observation.

This vehicle is a highly specialized prototype. If the electric drive train can power a small roadster like this with fantastic acceleration of 0-60 in three seconds, I would imagine that it could certainly power a more conventional vehicle and still provide performace beyond basic transportation.

I certainly hope that Wrightspeed gets more intrest and funding for his work. Sooner or later the basic combustion engine powertrain is going to be replaced. Not becuase were out of oil or its bad for the enviorment, but because something obviously better WILL replace it. The sooner that happens, the better – for everyone.

Finally because LLN likes to keep their readers in the dark:

http://money.cnn.com/2006/05/04/technology/business2_wrightspeed/

05/05, 6:34 PM

posted by:

Carboy

Boring

05/05, 7:10 PM

posted by:

kevin

they should’ve raced the regular atom against the electric one, if i remember right, the atom running with a civic engine does 0-60 in like 2.5 seconds

05/05, 7:57 PM

posted by:

Mitch

I believe the recharge time for the vehicle is 4.5 hours. Yikes.

Wrightspeed X1 Beats Ferrari and Porsche

This car is faster than a Mercedes SLR, Corvette Z06, or Ferrari Enzo. It’s also a heck of a lot faster than a Ferrari 360 Modena or Porsche Carerra GT. It can hit 60 mph in just 3 seconds which is faster than just anything out there. It’s an…

05/06, 10:07 AM

posted by:

TW

I find the “put downs” on this vehicle amusing. Some poeple have no sence of history. Cars at the turn of the century were unreliable, experimental and in some cases a “joke”, but look at where are today. You have to start somewhere to advance technology. This vehicle is an experiment, but valid non the less.

05/06, 1:27 PM

posted by:

DC

Golly, so this experiment electric car… which costs an undisclosed amount of money barely beats a Caterham 7!

(Caterham 7: 0-60 mph in 3.1 seconds)

And the Caterham sells for between $60-65,000… and has an unlimited range, save for the few minutes it takes to refill the gas tank.

Wow… so very, very… unimpressive.

05/06, 3:40 PM

posted by:

Random Jerk

Wow, DC #16 misses the point entirely. His logic and reasoning so very, very… unimpressive.

05/06, 8:05 PM

posted by:

DC

Well, since I missed the point… care to explain it to me?

Is it that a very expensive electric car that only works for 1.5 hours before needing a 4.5 hour recharge has a very slight advantage to a much less expensive Caterham 7?

Or that perhaps the very expensive super-exotics which lost to the electric car are less capable in the 0-60 mph tests than a cheaper Caterham 7?

Either way, was I supposed to be impressed?

Or rather… why are YOU?

05/07, 6:44 PM

posted by:

JohnnyBlazE

Don’t forget Commuter Car’s Tango – that was impressive a year ago… now this has over 3 times the range and is a second quicker to 60… times are achanging!

Yes, 16 misses the point. I love petrol, but I love advances in technology too…

Silent electric cars are a danger though!

05/08, 1:29 PM

posted by:

dan

careful browsers will find that ACP has given up the tzero to supply electric components instead of trying to break into retail sales with an entire car. I think this is a great way to promote what’s available, the ACP AC-150 motor and controller package, and to show it’s flexibility of application. It takes up very little space, and 4.5hrs of charging time isn’t really anything. I am curious as to why their range is so limited compared to the ACP tzero though, as this ought to benefit as well.

05/12, 4:44 PM

posted by:

norby

Count me among the unimpressed.
The original Atom is faster.
They are essentially racing 1/2 a car against some very finely finished supercars.
Try driving that thing on a hot or cold day. Or a rainy day. Or while in traffic breathing exhaust fumes.
And it only BARELY beat them at the end of the 1/4 mile.
A good experiment? Yes.
Match the hype? NOPE.

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel