Hi I was looking for Denny Klein Water Power on Saturday, when I came across your Hillary Is 44 ” Blog Archive ” Levi Johnston Poses Nude page. Thanks and i think this site some more on this …I am a bit confused! Check out my site for more infor…

I’m not a conspiracy nut. I only speak up because I witnessed this first hand.
I lived next door to a nice fellow who in the late 80′s made such claims, a few months after going public, he was killed. His killer has never been found. Many men in suits came into his house, and unloaded all his “work” and I never heard anything about it again.

What does the goverment do when a company tries to bypass our need for oil? Check it out at http://www.switchtohydrogen.com

The goverment has issued an injuction, stopping them from obtaining a chemical critical in generating your own hydrogen harmlessly and best of all FREE.

Hydrogen based cars are nothing new, but the solar powered hydrogen generators they were/are prepaired to sell us are.

Open your eyes people. There is alot of misinformation out there, and I believe the gov etc.. is behind it.

GM was suppose to have bought it from the inventor and paid him 5 million dollars, then never produced it. Being that was 30 years ago it seems that they thought I would not remember this.

So if anyone did some research they will find this tobe another hoax.

Do some background research on the principles of how both electrolysis and fuel cells (the reverse process of electrolysis) work. Wikipedia has some good articles. Even better, howstuffworks.com has an excellent article on fuel cells.

The energy required to split/shatter water molecules IS the energy that is eventually released by either burning or catalyzing the hydrogen gas. To advocate otherwise is to advocate a perpetual motion machine.

Klein’s paper posits that inefficient electrolysis has always been a barrier to hydrogen production – WRONG. Most of the inefficiency arises during either the production of the electricity itself, or during the burning or catalysis of the H2.

Energy is NOT inherent to H atoms. Energy is inherent to the BONDS between them.

Water isn’t dangerous unless your head is being held under it.

Water isn’t dangerous unless your head is being held under it.

2. Do a search for HyZor in google and see how this technology DOES apply TODAY. That said, this guy is a ‘claim jumper’ because this technology has been around since at least the 60′s, maybe earlier.

POINT: The guy in the story is the joke, not the technology.

Vegetable oil is an inexpensive way of running your car, and I applaud you for having the where-with-all to do it, but unfortunately it’s inappropriate to label it as a “solution”, or more specifically, a widespread solution. The people who use vegetable oil as a fuel are able to do so because they are a very select few. If EVERYONE were to suddenly jump on the bandwagon, so to speak, it would put an immense strain on the agricultural system, and costs would skyrocket.

A more humourous downside is the smell. I had a friend who ran his old Mercedes Benz turbo diesel on used vegetable oil, and he eventually had to get rid of the car because he got incredibly sick everytime the engine ran.

You can also seperate the heavy white fats from the red fats and just burn the red fats which allows the oil to be used in any diesel engine. Please have a look at http://www.bio-power.com for more info

If it were for real, there would be independent testing laboratory reports, and scientific articles published in reputable journals. Not to mention a Nobel prize for transcending the laws of thermodynamics.

If you google, you can find sub atomic physicists laughing at his patent, saying he did a very good job of pseudo science babble, and pointing out the flaws.
There are four or five flaws in the news video itself, but many in the patent.

P.S. alternators already are shut off when not in use; that’s what the voltage regulator does. When there is no current flowing in the windings the alternator presents no load other than the friction of the bearings and belt. It is the opposing magnetic fields that cause a load on the engine, and those opposing fields also generate electricity to charge the battery. This only happens when the regulator turns the alternator on.

1. Most automobiles run their alternators all the time. This burns fuel, and the load is wasted. The car battery only needs a limited amount of electricity to recharge it. Hybrid cars solve this by selectively running their alternator (it only runs when the battery needs charging).

2. Rather than shut off the alternator, this new system makes use of this wasted electricity or load.

3. He does not store the HHO gas so there is no relative little increase in the danger of explosion. It is used on demand.

4. Some have suggested that simply shutting off the alternator would have the same effect as producing HHO. I am not sure if that is accurate. Would the two really be equivalent? You would have to calculate the load the alternator places upon the engine and the amount of gasoline it consumes. Shutting off the alternator would save gas but how much?

5. What are the relative efficiencies of his process? How much gas is produced based upon watts consumed? Is it really enhancing the performance of the engine to the point where the expense is justifiable? In other words, if the unit costs $7,000, what MPG would you need to get to make it worth your time. ($7,000 is what he’s selling his generators for) Okay, maybe with volume production he gets the price down to $1,000. I would still want to see how much gas I would be saving. What would my MPG be in order to earn it back? If it took ten years of driving, I don’t think it would be worth it.

6. Next you would have to compare that to amount of HHO produced by the same unit of electricity produced by the combustion of gasoline. According to the inventor, HHO is more reactive than simple H2 O2. If this were true, it would reduce the inefficiencies of the engine and thus yield better gas mileage. Even if he is simply producing hydrogen, how much is he producing given the amount of electricity his device consumes? Would it really be better than simply shutting down the alternator?

7. Is he really saying that he’s creating more energy than he uses, or is he proposing that HHO is more reactive than standard H2 O2? It sounds as if his theories on HHO are dubious at best.

8. How is the device producing the HHO gas? Has he invented a better method of electrolysis?

9. What volume of HHO gas is produced based upon his method of electrolysis? He must be producing something with his generator because he is selling the welding generators. I’m not saying welding with HHO is a good thing to do, but he is doing it. The video of his system working makes that clear. If they did not, he would be shut down very fast.

“the issue here is that this is novel, unique and new—-the fact that it doesn’t conform to your knowledge of science and laws of physics, blah blah blah, couldn’t matter less to us—this is something new and different, it is what we say, and we are now way too busy to deal with you.
Buzz off now, back to your job at the photomat.”

At best, this company is advocating pseudoscience, and at worse, they’re flat-out white collar criminals.

So no, it isn’t stable. That’s why they have to produce it on site. Otherwise they’d be selling it in tanks.

Also, I stated that it gets energy from hydrogen BONDS, which are present in the HHO molecule. Considering the instability, the “patented” gas also likely contains a good deal of straight-up H2.

As an efficient electrolysis process, this is actually quite nice, because HHO degrades rapidly into h2 and o2. But the notion of “running on water” is completely erroneous. It runs on hydrogen bonds, NOT water. As with any other exothermic reaction, it requires an endothermic energy investment. Period.

If anyone wants a copy of the paper, let me know.

“regarding where the energy comes from in the auto
application—you get electricity from the alternator—it produces our gas
as you drive, our gas gets injected into the fuel-tank and bonds with
gasoline—upon combustion you get greater HP and better gas mileage and
much cleaner emissions.”

In other words, the gas’s power ultimately can be traced back to the gasoline which runs the engine, which in turn runs the alternator. So it’s a way of making use of a small amount of otherwise wasted gasoline power. Nothing more.

So why not selectively turn the alternator on and off? Hybrid cars are already capable of this (their engine shuts off at low speed). BMW has concepts that do this regardless of whether the the engine is running: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Features/articleId=115127

12 volts, 30 amps is 360 watts, or about half a horsepower.
This is used to make hydrogen, at up to 90% efficiency.
The hydrogen is then burned at 25% efficiency, to give you 360×0.9×0.25, or 81 watts of useful power output.
In other words, you have added 279 watts of load to your engine.

-Homer Simpson

They say its safe enough and are beginning dev of a military Hummer… hmm.

When married with a traditional fuel system, 4HP input into the water based system gives back 17HP… *shrugs*