2008 Volkswagen Phaeton

March7

volkswagen-phaeton-facelift.jpg

Volkswagen has revealed a subtle evolution of its Phaeton luxury sedan for the European market. No longer offered in the United States, this updated Phaeton will arrive in dealerships summer 2007.

The car is now offered with a new 3.0-litre V6 TDI engine developing 238 horsepower — a 13 hp rise over the outgoing V6 TDI engine. The common rail direct injection engine already meets tough Euro V emissions standards ahead of the 2009 deadline. The new powerplant is joined by three gas units in 3.2-litre V6 240 hp, 4.2-litre V8 335 hp and 6.0-litre W12 450 hp guises in either short or long wheelbase platforms.

New front lights feature bi-Xenon bulbs designed to adapt to the direction of the front wheels and illuminate the road accordingly. They are joined by LED running lights integrated within the headlamp units and a new, reprofiled bonnet.

A Front and Side Scan system has been fitted to the Phaeton for the first time. Front Scan can automatically bring the vehicle to a complete stop in extreme circumstances should the system sense a hazard ahead. Side Scan monitors the area beside the vehicle for any obstacles to make changing lanes on the motorway safer. Should an obstacle be sensed a warning is transmitted to the driver.

Simplified controls for the Phaeton’s entertainment systems are joined by an elegant new Bluetooth-enabled phone with voice control and the capacity to store up to 1,000 contacts.

Further aesthetic enhancements include two new designs of 19” alloy wheels to set the new Phaeton further apart from its predecessor.




 


42 Comments

  1. This is an awesome automobile for anyone who has actually seen it in the States. Too bad it is no longer sold here, but the American buyer was, and is still not mentality accepting an expensive VW.

    Comment by F451, posted on March7 at 12:43 pm
  2. The 3.2L seems a little pointless with the new V6 making only 2 less horsepower. Gotta love those big plants though!

    Comment by PrimeGTP, posted on March7 at 12:44 pm
  3. F451,
    I think people just prefered the looks & elegance of the A8.
    Putting a 240hp 3.2L V6 in a car like this is just retarded.
    BTW, I can’t see the “face-lift”. I guess I have to dig up some pics on google and compare side by side. I just don’t see it.

    Comment by Andre Neves, posted on March7 at 12:50 pm
  4. NO……… it is not an awesome automobile.
    It was and is a larger overpriced VW Passat and that’s why it didn’t and will not do well in the US.

    US preception is as follows:
    VW = Honda
    Audi = Acura
    and that’s the way it is.
    This car is proof.

    Comment by DeezNutz, posted on March7 at 12:53 pm
  5. I thought VW = Honda - reliability. I never hear anything good about a VW longterm.

    Comment by bb_454, posted on March7 at 12:56 pm
  6. ^um…get your facts straight before you post man. It was based on the A8 platform, it was sold here in the U.S but was halted for import due to really poor sales, and your ideas on “US preception” in automobiles is just plain stupid. I don’t know where you get your info from but it’s all wrong. Due us all a favor and just leave your dumb posts over at the streetfire site. Come back when you have hair on your chest.

    Comment by Andre Neves, posted on March7 at 12:56 pm
  7. ^that was meant for DeezNutz BTW.

    Comment by Andre Neves, posted on March7 at 12:57 pm
  8. The Phaeton was a cool car, esp. since it’s basically the Bentley Flying Spur underneath. The prob. with the Phaeton is that the A8 is not only a better looking car, better built, with a nicer interior, but also because of it’s better attributes, more bang for your buck.

    Jon.

    Comment by imageWIS, posted on March7 at 12:59 pm
  9. I’m sure it having horrible electrical problems helped take from our shores too.

    Comment by jonstew, posted on March7 at 1:13 pm
  10. I agree that it was a very nice car, but regardless of what platform it had, it still looked like a Passat on a half dose of steroids. Beyond that the perception of most people I’ve discussed this with is… “VWs don’t cost this much”.

    Andre Neves…read before you blow your top. DeezNutz didn’t say is was a Passat platform. He was refering to the simularity of looks.

    Comment by Bush, posted on March7 at 1:14 pm
  11. Dre:
    Learn how to read and comprehend.
    What “fact” of mine was incorrect.
    I never said it was “based” on the Passat.
    Boy, I have bought and owned more cars then you have ever sat in.

    Thank You Bush.

    Comment by DeezNutz, posted on March7 at 1:43 pm
  12. It didn’t need a facelift. It needs a markdown.

    Comment by Ricardo Head, posted on March7 at 1:55 pm
  13. Exactly what everyone else is saying: the A8 was just a better car all around. The phaeton was beautiful and rare and elegant, but the A8 matched it and then stomped on it. As much as id say id drive this great car, id drive an A8 over it.

    Comment by A4, posted on March7 at 2:16 pm
  14. And andre, about the 3.2 V6, all these grand-luxury cruisers in europe have the smaller corporate V6’s. MB, Audi, and BMW all have V6 options for their S/A8/7-series.

    Comment by A4, posted on March7 at 2:18 pm
  15. Fat, far reaching and a self indulgent effort by Volkswagen. The factory is a looker though.

    Comment by meanpants555, posted on March7 at 2:26 pm
  16. that interior is terrible

    Comment by Don, posted on March7 at 3:03 pm
  17. Stealth Wealth at its finest. Shame they couldn’t sell it here. The specs on the car really shocked me for such a machine. Maybe they’ll try to sell it in America again in a few years on an “on Demand” basis.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on March7 at 3:40 pm
  18. Has anyone ever even seen one of these on the road? ive seen so many new bentlys ive lost count, and i live in a ****y little town. what a blunder, and to thoose who say ppl wont pay for an expensive vdub what about the tuareg?

    Comment by megator, posted on March7 at 4:23 pm
  19. Still looks bland to me. Has no soul and does not fit into the VW lineup.

    Comment by V-series, posted on March7 at 5:27 pm
  20. There are a few, owned by business men and by doctors. They’re real easy to mistake for Passats.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on March7 at 5:45 pm
  21. Hollywood celebrities would sue over a facelift this subtle!

    Comment by autonutt, posted on March7 at 6:07 pm
  22. The interior used to be really nice, like 2+ years ago. Now so much now though. However it is stealthy as Blakkarr, and good looking from the front.

    Comment by LamborghiniZ, posted on March7 at 7:20 pm
  23. VW Phaeton = The answer to a question no one ever asked.

    Comment by 56oval, posted on March7 at 9:51 pm
  24. In response to people paying for the Touareg.. I may be incorrect here but Audi only just now came out with an SUV, correct?

    But yeah, I wouldn’t buy an Audi/VW myself. Just not into the brands, and the reliability (or lack thereof) record isn’t particularly making me want one.

    Comment by 0GSharK6, posted on March7 at 10:12 pm
  25. I can’t believe they’re still building this thing…

    Comment by 1966_GTO_, posted on March8 at 1:47 am
  26. I can’t remember the last time I saw one. Why does it need a facelift, no-one’s seen enough of them to be bored of the last model.

    Comment by europerspective, posted on March8 at 2:28 am
  27. I can’t believe how many retards around here refuse to get their small minds around what the Phaeon is. Its a Bentley quality car at 1/2 to 1/3rd of the price. Infact the initial construction of Phaetons and Bentleys takes place in the same factory in former east Germany. This car destroys the Lexus LS, Mercedes S class, and BMW 7 series. This is the daily transport car for Pope, and The Chancellor of Germany. If you refuse to understand the Phaeton, it just means you’re stupid.

    Comment by Madcapp, posted on March8 at 2:31 am
  28. bb_454: well, over here they get a beating and keep on going. Best of all, they don’t begin rusting after only a year, unlike some other company…

    Comment by 1c3d0g, posted on March8 at 7:04 am
  29. Expensive as hell, and they can’t figure out how to design a center stack so the shifter doesn’t block the lower buttons, lol.

    Comment by PrimeGTP, posted on March8 at 7:08 am
  30. Madcapp, the Phaeton does not destroy any of the cars you mentioned except maybe in price and I think that is even debatable. The car has a horrible electrical system even by German standards. If you get the small engine it is painfully slow and if you get the W12 they suck down dead dinosaurs faster than you can put more in the tank. The cars reliability record is not too great either. Oh and the reason those people you mentioned have them is because VW gave them the cars not because they bought them.

    Comment by jonstew, posted on March8 at 7:29 am
  31. god just kill it. its not selling

    Comment by 55amg, posted on March8 at 8:31 am
  32. Ahh the Phaeton… one of the best buy used car out there at around $36K. Only an idiot would buy a new one though.

    Comment by Veda, posted on March8 at 9:44 am
  33. its a big passat. deff not worth the price tag.

    Comment by anyclearer, posted on March8 at 9:14 pm
  34. Here’s a nifty fact, a W12 Phaeton without a limiter will go 201 miles per hour without any engine modifications. Top gear did a great video which explains the genius that is the Pheaton. And will help even the belligerently ignorant to understand why it is so vastly superior to the Mercedes S class, BMW 7 series, and Lexus LS.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KmGNRMOpg7E

    Comment by Madcapp, posted on March8 at 10:57 pm
  35. Madcapp: It’s humorous that you never responded to jonstew’s comment about how all of those high and mighty characters you mentioned before that “drive Phaeton’s”, such as the Pope, etc, own them because VW gives them to them as GIFTS. I’ll break it down even more for you: THE PHAETON IS A FREE GIFT FROM VW TO THE POPE. The Pope and the Chancellor of Germany don’t have Phaeton’s because they CHOOSE them, they have them because they were FREE GIFTS. End of story! Not to mention how the Phaeton does anything but destroy the 2007 S-Class, are you…joking? The Phaeton might have been good competition for the LAST gen S-Class, but the current one? NO COMPETITION! Hand’s down the S-Class demolishes the Phaeton, it’s a known fact. Now I agree with you on the level that it is an underrated car, I realize that it actually is quite good in its class and people simply ignore it due to the fact that there is a dinner plate sized VW emblem on the grille, but that doesn’t make it a class leader. That’s one thing it never was, and still isn’t, no matter how decently competitive it is.

    Comment by LamborghiniZ, posted on March8 at 11:08 pm
  36. There’s no humor to my method. The Pope is simply provided with the very best, always. Its not a matter of who is willing to give him a car… Everyone is, don’t you think all manufacturers want that product placement? Don’t you think the Cathloc church can afford wahtever they want?. After 75 years of being provided with Mercedes-Benzes from their special vehicles division, the Pope is now in a Phaeton. There’s a legitimate reason for it, that you choose to ignore, and that reason is because the Phaeton is simply superior to the S class, its not an act of desperation. All those characters, like the chancellor of Germany can request/be provided with whatever they want. And there’s more examples, The Government of Hong Kong replaced its E38 BMW 7 Series fleet with 35 Phaetons in October 2006. The Prime Minster of Portugal and North Korean Officials are all chauffeured in Phaetons. Grow up and deal with it, the Phaeton is a world class car. Don’t forget VW is also Bentley, Bugatti, and Lamborghini…they have the finest engineering staff in the world. Is it any surprise that the Phaeton is so superior? Is it any surprise that Americans are too stupid to look past a badge?

    Comment by Madcapp, posted on March9 at 10:29 am
  37. this may be good but the fact of the matter is, its not selling. kill it.

    Comment by 55amg, posted on March9 at 11:47 am
  38. Madcapp: Clearly I understand that the VW/Audi group makes pristine vehicles, I’m a true diehard Lamborghini fan, and the quality of Audi and Bentley are known far and wise. The Phaeton, however, doesn’t seem to be the world class beater you describe. Yes, famous people drive them, but does that make them necessarily good? You know the old saying, just because something is popular doesn’t make it good (which is ironic as we’re talking about the Phaeton as being popular, one adjective I’d never attribute to that vehicle). The new S-Class is the car to beat, it’s been revised so that it exceeds the rest of the class in almost every way possible, the Phaeton is still the same as it was in 2004, like I said it’s a good car, but since then times have changed and the S-Class has become the finest, most modern example of the luxury sedan there is. And the Pope was also given a Volvo XC90, another “good” car, but it sure as hell ain’t the class leader either, now is it?

    Comment by LamborghiniZ, posted on March9 at 3:51 pm
  39. Fair enough LamborghiniZ. I just see too many people who are instantly dismissive of the Phaeton because its got the wrong badge in the grill, without bothering to understand the car at all.

    Comment by Madcapp, posted on March9 at 4:04 pm
  40. If I understand it correctly the Phaeton is a car that really wasn’t supposed to be. It wsa the out going project of a retiring exec in the company. As such VW made an awesome first go at it, but to my knowledge is not pursuing it further. Building such machines, as over the top as this one seems to be, is not VW’s M.O.

    Compete with eth S-class or 7-series? it could trash them, if VW decides to throughly update it. VW is not known for making junk, so one could rightfully expect one truly magnificent car… But somehow I doubt it.

    Audi might pick it up and continue it… as an Audi… I mean for pity’s sake, this car can do 200+ as is and feel like it was doing only 60. I somehow doubt the S-class and the 7-series can match that… I might be wrong… but still VW has developed a real winner in the Phaeton. I’d hate to see it languish.

    Comment by Blakkarr, posted on March10 at 3:37 am
  41. The good news is you can get them for CHEAP here in the U.S.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2004-VW-Phaeton-Rare-Like-new-Fully-Loaded_W0QQitemZ200087805905QQcategoryZ147119QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

    Check that out, a 2004 Phaeton with 52,000 miles, and for a buy it now of $31,000. Now I found cheaper examples on there actually, one with a buy it now for $27,000, but this one has a MINT interior/exterior. What a DEAL on an ultra luxury car, see that’s what the VW badge and a lack of sales does to you, makes them real cheap. Wouldn’t even be a bad purchase at that price, you can buy loaded family cars for $31,000, or you can have a sleeper luxury mobile.

    Comment by LamborghiniZ, posted on March10 at 10:20 am
  42. Actually this article that’s about a cosmetic update demonstrates VW is still committed to the Phaeton. Unfortunately, the photos here are of the most basic short wheelbase V8 variant which is a low spec car. Admittedly, they are pretty boring. However, the interior options VW makes available are staggering, and for those interested in seeing what is possible, here’s a link to some better equipped Phaetons.

    http://forums.vwvortex.com/zerothread?id=1621229

    Also interesting, nobody has ever been killed while traveling inside a Phaeton during wreck. And only 1 has ever been stolen…the insurance rates are dirt cheap.

    Comment by Madcapp, posted on March10 at 1:28 pm

Leave a comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.



Auto Loan
Request a Auto Loan from LendingTree.com
Car Rentals
For convenient car rental locations in the US, use Dollar Car Rental.
Insurance Quotes
Quote, compare and save! Free auto insurance quotes at Progressive.com
Auto Insurance
Unitrin Direct: Get an auto insurance quote & save up to $303 or more.