<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2010 Volvo C70 [Live image update]</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 05:20:50 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kingston</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485966</link>
		<dc:creator>kingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:09:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485966</guid>
		<description>this picture might help explain what i am talking about. http://www.discountvoparts.com/includes/images/Volvo_Parts/VolvoTailights.jpg</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this picture might help explain what i am talking about. <a href="http://www.discountvoparts.com/includes/images/Volvo_Parts/VolvoTailights.jpg" rel="nofollow">http://www.discountvoparts.com/includes/images/Volvo_Parts/VolvoTailights.jpg</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kingston</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485964</link>
		<dc:creator>kingston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:07:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485964</guid>
		<description>I am just glad to see that Volvo is getting away from the old/dated taillight design, you know with the stupid nub on the top inside, if that makes since.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am just glad to see that Volvo is getting away from the old/dated taillight design, you know with the stupid nub on the top inside, if that makes since.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewVolvoOwner</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485752</link>
		<dc:creator>NewVolvoOwner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485752</guid>
		<description>Sorry should have been Volvo has NOW designated this........</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry should have been Volvo has NOW designated this&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NewVolvoOwner</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485751</link>
		<dc:creator>NewVolvoOwner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 03:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485751</guid>
		<description>Not the 210 C70.  Volvo has not designated this as the 2011 C70.  Feels like bate and switch to those who bought a 2010 C70 thinking they would get new upgrades.  What a slap in the face!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not the 210 C70.  Volvo has not designated this as the 2011 C70.  Feels like bate and switch to those who bought a 2010 C70 thinking they would get new upgrades.  What a slap in the face!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: global_lightning</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485631</link>
		<dc:creator>global_lightning</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:21:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485631</guid>
		<description>Good looking, but it needs the 2.9L inline-6 turbo from the S80 &amp; the 4.4L Yamaha V8 from the XC90.  Volvo&#039;s inline-5 are getting old, especially in their top of the line models.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good looking, but it needs the 2.9L inline-6 turbo from the S80 &amp; the 4.4L Yamaha V8 from the XC90.  Volvo&#8217;s inline-5 are getting old, especially in their top of the line models.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donfuy</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485572</link>
		<dc:creator>Donfuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 17:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485572</guid>
		<description>Awesome looking car.

This. Is. Smoooth sex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome looking car.</p>
<p>This. Is. Smoooth sex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485468</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:42:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485468</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve always liked this car due to the fact that you can get a used one 2-3 years old for less than 30K.  It&#039;s the best auto hardtop convertible deal out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always liked this car due to the fact that you can get a used one 2-3 years old for less than 30K.  It&#8217;s the best auto hardtop convertible deal out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlueIndependent</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485467</link>
		<dc:creator>BlueIndependent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 15:36:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485467</guid>
		<description>Why Volvo refuses to up the power in this thing is a real head-scratcher. It&#039;s had the same engine and horsepower rating for 12 years now. It&#039;s the prettiest Volvo ever, but they should at least be putting in the now-dead S60R&#039;s powertrain. 300hp is not that high these days and I would think volvo could retain its image and still sport that kind of power.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why Volvo refuses to up the power in this thing is a real head-scratcher. It&#8217;s had the same engine and horsepower rating for 12 years now. It&#8217;s the prettiest Volvo ever, but they should at least be putting in the now-dead S60R&#8217;s powertrain. 300hp is not that high these days and I would think volvo could retain its image and still sport that kind of power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AutoCritical</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-c70.html/comment-page-1#comment-485408</link>
		<dc:creator>AutoCritical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 14:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/?p=18619#comment-485408</guid>
		<description>This is a tight and tough looking ride. It’s not aggressive, but still knows how to assert itself. I like how the front is more wrapped around with its drawn back headlamps that elongate the nose. The tall body side emphasizes a more desirable small DLO opening which I think really fits in with this type of car. you can see what I mean on the sketches at http://bit.ly/obLwT</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a tight and tough looking ride. It’s not aggressive, but still knows how to assert itself. I like how the front is more wrapped around with its drawn back headlamps that elongate the nose. The tall body side emphasizes a more desirable small DLO opening which I think really fits in with this type of car. you can see what I mean on the sketches at <a href="http://bit.ly/obLwT" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/obLwT</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
