<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Volvo to add XC30?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 00:38:22 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Get Real</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348936</link>
		<dc:creator>Get Real</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:41:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348936</guid>
		<description>With only 10 comments, sales are going to be spectacular.

No, I don&#039;t mean silicone enhanced &quot;spectacular&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With only 10 comments, sales are going to be spectacular.</p>
<p>No, I don&#8217;t mean silicone enhanced &#8220;spectacular&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LP640</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348894</link>
		<dc:creator>LP640</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 04:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348894</guid>
		<description>^typical moron its so evident your iq is well below 50 dumbshit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>^typical moron its so evident your iq is well below 50 dumb****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CA36GTP</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348715</link>
		<dc:creator>CA36GTP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 17:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348715</guid>
		<description>Every time Volvo builds a new car, someone falls asleep at the wheel and nails a telephone pole.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every time Volvo builds a new car, someone falls asleep at the wheel and nails a telephone pole.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Veda</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348631</link>
		<dc:creator>Veda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:49:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348631</guid>
		<description>The S40 is actually a very decent vehicle that&#039;s priced competitively.  Though with the difference of $800 for a fully loaded S40 T5 AWD compared with a fully loaded G35x, only those looking to save $ on gas would choose the volvo.  I guess they want to stay out of that competition and jump to the crossover craze directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The S40 is actually a very decent vehicle that&#8217;s priced competitively.  Though with the difference of $800 for a fully loaded S40 T5 AWD compared with a fully loaded G35x, only those looking to save $ on gas would choose the volvo.  I guess they want to stay out of that competition and jump to the crossover craze directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johnnycanuck</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348630</link>
		<dc:creator>johnnycanuck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 04:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348630</guid>
		<description>I disagree. Quantum physics is confusing. Volvo is Ovlov spelled backwards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree. Quantum physics is confusing. Volvo is Ovlov spelled backwards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TOZO</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348625</link>
		<dc:creator>TOZO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 02:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348625</guid>
		<description>Volvo is too getting confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Volvo is too getting confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: deutschetouring1337</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348617</link>
		<dc:creator>deutschetouring1337</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 01:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348617</guid>
		<description>I can wait to see the new Swedish C30 Touring car in action. I bet Volvo brings over the E85 C30 variant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can wait to see the new Swedish C30 Touring car in action. I bet Volvo brings over the E85 C30 variant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zoomzoomr</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348611</link>
		<dc:creator>zoomzoomr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 00:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348611</guid>
		<description>Ford has screwed up Volvo&#039;s alphabet soup naming scheme completely.  In a perfect world, there should either be XC30/XC60/XC90 or XC50/XC70/XC90.. but now it looks like they will have XC30/XC60/XC70/XC90.  Now that the S80 has begat the new V70, I expect the S40/V50 replacements to be named S60/V50.  Will the 5-door C30 be the next S40, or perhaps a V20?  Who knows..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford has screwed up Volvo&#8217;s alphabet soup naming scheme completely.  In a perfect world, there should either be XC30/XC60/XC90 or XC50/XC70/XC90.. but now it looks like they will have XC30/XC60/XC70/XC90.  Now that the S80 has begat the new V70, I expect the S40/V50 replacements to be named S60/V50.  Will the 5-door C30 be the next S40, or perhaps a V20?  Who knows..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SwerveEarly</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348606</link>
		<dc:creator>SwerveEarly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348606</guid>
		<description>Ford and Volvo producst are so intertwined it would be a shame to sell Volvo now.  Im not sold on their present marketing plan and lineup, not to mention the recent announcement to cut dealers back does not give one confidence.  New XC looks good, love the style of the new c30.  Quality is good, safety record is impeccable and they make a great cold climate car.  Having said that they need a little help in performance and interior style area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ford and Volvo producst are so intertwined it would be a shame to sell Volvo now.  Im not sold on their present marketing plan and lineup, not to mention the recent announcement to cut dealers back does not give one confidence.  New XC looks good, love the style of the new c30.  Quality is good, safety record is impeccable and they make a great cold climate car.  Having said that they need a little help in performance and interior style area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: corvette</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348596</link>
		<dc:creator>corvette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 22:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348596</guid>
		<description>ford should sell volvo, its a crime to see a decent company under their control</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ford should sell volvo, its a crime to see a decent company under their control</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: autonut</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html/comment-page-1#comment-348585</link>
		<dc:creator>autonut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Dec 2007 21:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/volvo-to-add-xc30.html#comment-348585</guid>
		<description>I guess it will not be &quot;C&quot; but &quot;V&quot; as wagon. However, they do sell V50 based on S40 which is about the size of S60. Ford screwed their logic completely. We probably will not get it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I guess it will not be &#8220;C&#8221; but &#8220;V&#8221; as wagon. However, they do sell V50 based on S40 which is about the size of S60. Ford screwed their logic completely. We probably will not get it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
