RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

Review: 2010 Volvo XC60

02/02/2009, 12:44 PM

By Mark Elias

As a Swedish brand, Volvo has always moved against the grain. Ford’s Scandinavian unit is a proud export from the land that brings forth sobering stares from its countrymen, (not to mention impossibly beautiful looks from its women) the jumpy music of ABBA, affordable design from Ikea and lutefisk* (don’t ask), Volvo has also long been at the forefront of safety technology – and now accident mitigation.

Staffed with their own accident investigation team, Volvo has gone to new lengths to help avoid accidents in the first place or, if crunch time is inevitable, at least assist in reducing the overall effect of the contact that is about to take place. This takes us to the 2010 Volvo XC60. The results are impressive, but do these features help to make this the perfect Volvo, much less the perfect car?

What is it?
A five-seater crossover, the new XC60 borrows from the past while casting a glance toward the future. Utilizing a new teardrop-shaped, cross-sectioned design, the XC60 looks like few Volvos since the P1800 and its modern hatchback counterpart, the C30.

All this and it even watches to see if you are nodding off during the time you are behind the wheel, sounding alerts and showing the dashboard light that depicts the universal symbol for driver alertness, the coffee cup.

What’s it up against?
Immediately, the Mercedes-Benz GLK comes to mind. From the standpoint of money, figure in the BMW X3, Ford Edge, Land Rover LR2, Nissan Murano, Volkswagen Tiguan and the recently announced Audi Q5.

Any breakthroughs?
Once again, Volvo brings forth new features that emphasize vehicle and driver safety that will most likely will trickle down into other vehicles in current parent company Ford’s product portfolio – assuming Ford holds onto Volvo long enough to do so.

These items include the new City Safety program, which has forward facing sensors that literally keep an eye on traffic directly in front of you to pre-charge the brakes to bring the car to a complete halt without making contact with the vehicle in front of you. If your speed is too high and a crash seems inevitable, the program cinches up the seat belts, pre-charges the brakes, and hopefully minimizes the effects that contact with another vehicle will bring. The City Safety function can be turned off, but will be re-engaged the next time the car is started.

How does it look?
Reminding us of Volvos past, the XC60 has many of the classic design cues from the iconic P1800 of the early 1960s, including the v-like, boat hull shape, bold shoulders, side strakes, and the largish glass panel at the rear. A stylized gaping-mouth grille leads off with a new version of the Volvo iron mark logo holding court in the very front. Below resides a large silvertoned portion of the front bumper giving the appearance of an off-road skid plate, but even with over nine-inches of ground clearance, reality dictates that this vehicle ain’t gonna be off-roading any time soon.

Overall, we think the quirkiness that has always attracted us to Scandinavian design is what makes the XC60 more interesting to us than the Lexus RX or Land Rover LR2.

According to Volvo Design Director Steve Mattin, this is the new look the company will be headed for in the future. Silver colored rocker panels help to add visual interest along the sides while the now-familiar sky-high Volvo tail lamps, which help to anchor down both sides of the XC60’s “D”-panels. The silvered rocker panels lead to the faux rear skid plate, where they sit below what appears to be a piece of “frameless” rear glass that is part of the rear hatch assembly. Really, though, they cover up the frames, which are hidden by privacy glass in the rear portion of the car.

And inside?
Volvo’s interior design runs hot and cold. The duo-toned leather seating left us, uh, warm. Don’t get me wrong. We like the feel of Volvo’s seating, especially after being confined to them for four hours at a stretch during our test drive through San Francisco and up the Pacific Coast Highway. But we are happy to see that the seats will also be offered in other colors.

The XC60 seats five, with three of the passengers sharing the 40-20-40 seat split in the second row. The front-passenger seat also folds down for extra long objects that can be stored diagonally from front to back.

A very clean dash is not too busy with an optional navigation screen that is tilted slightly in favor of the driver. Floating gauges reside in a binnacle directly behind the steering wheel, which is covered by Volvo’s now familiar polished leather. In the past few years, Volvo has been using Dynaudio sound systems and the XC60 is no exception to that rule. But what is it with the standard HD Radio capability? We have still never had a chance to hear what all the excitement is about – to us, it just seems like more stations playing, well, more of the same.

There are enough buttons on the center stack to amuse even the lamest of techno-geeks, but, curiously, there was no reaction on the monitor when pushing the dashboard mounted controller buttons. It turns out that they are operated by buttons slightly outside the normal reach of most fingers on the rear of the steering wheel or via the remote control that is usually found inside the under-elbow storage bin. On the other end of the detail spectrum, though, kudos go to Volvo’s design team for finding some gorgeous oak to cover the center stack’s face.

But does it go?
With a snarling growl, yes!

Using the same 3.0-liter turbocharged inline six-cylinder engine that ships as standard in the S80 flagship sedan, the six’s 281-horses and 295 lb-ft of torque emit a snarl that will make any audio- or autophile happy.

A six-speed Geartronic (with slam-it-yourself capability) automatic transmission is coupled with Volvo’s all-wheel-drive system. The setup displayed great handling and traction during our jaunts up and down vineyard and ranch roads on the way to the Pacific Coast Highway. The ride was what we felt to be compliant, meaning not too stiff, and not too wallowy in its nature. Comprised of MacPherson struts in front and a multilink setup in rear, it made you want to test the cornering limits of the XC. Just in case, though, they have made Roll Stability Control standard throughout the line.

Volvo smartly dipped into the Land Rover parts bin before they left the building for India, and pulled out the company’s Hill Descent Control for optional availability in the XC60. Though off-roaders won’t flock to the XC60, we can see those who live in snowy climates taking advantage of the system.

But boasting a curb weight of 4,174 lbs., which is right in line with its competitors, we think they all need either a severe mileage increase, or a smaller engine. As it is, the XC60 hits the marks of 16 mpg city / and 22 mpg highway. As this review is going online, fuel prices are hovering just below $2-dollars, which could mean Volvo is in Fat City for the time being. With the past as prologue, though, it is inevitable that prices will go upward once again, and all these great small utility vehicles will possibly become liabilities on the dealer’s lot.

Why you would buy it:
With the kids out of the house, you won’t be needing that Excursion anymore. With the XC60, you can appear smart and worldly in one-fell-swoop.

Why you wouldn’t:
You were never a fan of Swedish cars – and besides, this one’s built in Belgium.

*Lutefisk: Filleted and air dried Cod, which is cured in lye for up to three days. According to some, it takes on the fragrance of a dumpster.

2010 Volvo XC60 base price, $37,900.

Words and photos by Mark Elias.

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

02/02, 1:35 PM

posted by:

Zach

Very good review. Everything I’ve read so far indicates this will be a sporty yet comfortable ride which is always vague. I would be interested to see how it stacks up against the GLK and A5 in a road test. A lot of people don’t get the whole Swedish car thing, but the design / ergonomics, ride and seats make it great for everyday driving and it’s tight enough to push it hard in the mountains (on those few occasions).

It’s not as much a driver’s car as the Germans, but at least it’s not a Lexus.

02/02, 1:39 PM

posted by:

A4

you mean Q5.

02/02, 1:40 PM

posted by:

A4

and this thing seems a bit redundant and overpriced; id much rather just get the XC70.

02/02, 1:41 PM

posted by:

idrinorbarsaku

i don’t think i like this thing. the inside looks a bit boring

02/02, 1:45 PM

posted by:

ricky_b

I have always adored the quickly avant garde styling of Volvos and this tops them all. My biggest concern is that the Audis Q5, though more sedate in styling, might prove to be sportier and more fuel efficient – for around the same price. Option wise, it is more afforable that the XC70 and I think it might prove to be a better package for passengers, but competition is fierce these days and with the state of Volvo and Ford these days, so might just hold off.

02/02, 1:48 PM

posted by:

TomF

The inside looks boring? It’s a classic Volvo interior except for the whacked-out two-tone seats.

I don’t really see the mission for the vehicle AND the XC70 AND the XC90… Volvo is slicing the market for snob-appeal high-priced Euro CUVs / SUVs too thin. And a rational buyer unaffected by snob-appeal factors would go for a Murano at $5k to $7k less.

02/02, 1:59 PM

posted by:

idrinorbarsaku

yeah! BORING! i don’t see anything eye catching in this! who cares about volvo classics when this car is brand new and it already looks like its a couple of years old.

02/02, 2:19 PM

posted by:

gugy

Too expensive.
Plus Volvo’s reliable mechanic quality. hehehe, NO THANKS!

02/02, 2:28 PM

posted by:

Lionwithoutpride

TomF-

Good to see you still around. That said, I guess I must be a snob for liking this . . . though, yer right about the PRICE . . . geez! Volvos will always be expensive because they are a niche product AND imported (double-whammy). The only solution I can think of is to keep the safety and styling and dial-down some of the amenities. Maybe Volvo can go back to the “near luxury” most of us Volvo folks grew up with, which should also take care of a hefty portion of the snob appeal TomF speaks of. Of course, that would also make Volvos even MORE of a niche vehicle, which would inevitably raise prices.

I will love Volvo as long as they keep their safety tech up to snuff and utility in the wagons. However, the only economic case I can make for the brand is that Ford benefits hugely from the trickle-down of safety equipment from Volvo engineering teams that exist in a culture of safety as the ultimate goal. I would hate to see Ford sell Volvo since I honestly do not believe Ford can maintain its vastly improved safety performance sans Volvo.

If Ford ever did sell Volvo to a Shanghai Automotive Group, or some other Chinese company, I would write off Volvo and Ford in a heartbeat. Volvo has barely survived Ford’s meddling (and many of you argue persuasively that it has NOT survived) and I doubt Volvo would survive a Chinese company’s ownership. These opinions are, honestly, nothing against the Chinese; but, rather, a disgust that Ford has considered selling Chinese companies an asset that would allow them access to the one tech (safety) barring their entry into the American market and the follow-on finishing-off of Detroit. We all know the Chinese are “communist” in name only, but does Ford really need to be the capitalist company that sells the noose to its own destroyer? Talk about a prophecy fulfilled . . .

02/02, 2:33 PM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

Is this a vehicle people are supposed to aspire to, or laugh at?

02/02, 2:39 PM

posted by:

idrinorbarsaku

i’m pretty sure it’s laugh at because it sure doesn’t aspire anything

02/02, 3:32 PM

posted by:

Zach

To A4, my bad -Q5. Q, R, S, TT (I’m starting to sing the alphabet song).

Concerning the XC70, the base price on a T6 is $5000 more ($2000 base price increase and $2995 Premium package for XC60’s standard leather and sunroof). I think the pricing is good, especially when compared to the XC70. I just wonder if there will be an XC70 market left. I will be ordering my XC60 this week.

02/02, 4:13 PM

posted by:

Need more oil for GM

It’s a Chevy Equinox wannabe. FAIL!

Buy American, Buy GM. It is your duty.

02/02, 4:36 PM

posted by:

ricky_b

NMOFGM – Same has been said about the Caddy SRX so get bent.

02/02, 7:02 PM

posted by:

zoomzoomer

Maybe I’m just being picky, but I hate that the sharply notched shoulder line of other Volvos seems to have been diluted and flattened out just so they could add another busy concave line right underneath it! And the greenhouse looks more Mazda CX-9 than Volvo. Overall it is a nice looking piece, but not as immediately identifiable as a modern Volvo as it could have been.

02/02, 8:30 PM

posted by:

jayjc08

I like the styling direction, I like the simple interior (or looks simple). Quality sounds great, good engine and good looks.

But why do these mini-SUV’s have to weigh SOOOOO damn much?! Most mid-sized 90’s SUV’s weighed less!! (Rodeo, Trooper, 4Runner, Explorer)

Weight savings? Virtually none.

And who wants to look at such a clean design… and then have that ugly metal thing right in your face at the front? A little bit of chrome with black paint is classy, but otherwise…

But other than that, I really do like this Volvo. Since the C30, they’ve been coming out with some very good products. I enjoy Scandinavian design… what I don’t desire is the high price and high costs associated with most of the new Volvo’s. They aren’t the safest cars for good reason…

02/02, 9:50 PM

posted by:

MurcieMe

I love this thing. I’d never buy one of these sort of machines, but this would probably be at the top of the list if I were to.

BUT What’s with those scenic pics at the end? Did the photographer just upload everything on the memory stick?

02/03, 12:30 AM

posted by:

melias

MurcieMe,

We at LLN are a full-service website, bringing you not only the cars, but scenics of the areas we get to drive the cars in. Mind you, we did not drive to Alcatraz, but figured most people wouldn’t mind seeing photos of the San Francisco area landmark.

The cell block is the area that was affectionately known as Broadway!

02/03, 9:25 AM

posted by:

A4

well XC60 or XC70, one is gonna have to win out im sure. Maybe someday theyll return us a new V90.

02/03, 12:09 PM

posted by:

ricky_b

A4 – HERE HERE. True Sports Wagons. CUVs are too tamed.

04/16, 4:21 PM

posted by:

muttonchops

I’ve never understood what the little bar lights next to the headlights are for. They don’t seem to have ANY relevance.

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel