RSS RSS Twitter Twitter
Leftlane - news, reviews, and info for the auto-industry
 
 

WAJ Days: First Impressions — High-Performance Compacts

05/07/2008, 7:04 PM

By Nick Aziz

During two days in Monterey, California at the Western Automotive Journalists media day recently, we had the chance to drive five different unabashedly performance-oriented cars all priced in the mid-$30,000 range.

Since these cars are as much about track performance (or at least the promise of it) as about daily-driver use, we were fortunate to get some laps on Mazda Raceway Laguna Seca as well as spins through the hills around Monterey. Though we wouldn’t claim that this constitutes an exhaustive comparison, here are our first impressions of all five:

Though Mitsubishi has rounded off some of the edges, the new Evo is still as ungainly on the outside, and boring black on the interior, as its predecessor. But proponents would argue that this car isn’t about looks; it’s about performance.
On the track, we had the opportunity to drive the MR with the new paddle-controlled twin-clutch sequential-shift transmission, which delivers spooky-fast shifts as fast as you can think of them.

A few days later, we were able to spend some time on the street with the GR-S (shown in the pictures), equipped with the old five-speed manual transmission. We were very impressed with the new tranny, which we think may be the wave of the future in performance cars, and would opt for that for either track or street use if it didn’t cost an extra $3300. Either way, the turbocharged two-liter engine putting out 295 horsepower and 300 pound-feet of torque delivers plenty of power and acceleration, but handling leaves something to be desired.

Though the all-wheel drive negates wheel spin and there’s a soupbowl full of alphabet stuff to keep the car pointed forward, the new Evo still has excessive body roll on fast corners. It will be a great track car with a little owner tuning, such as adjustable camber plates, different anti-sway bars, and possibly adjustable shocks, but shouldn’t an Evo already be totally track-capable right out of the box?

This second-generation WRX is a much more integrated design than its predecessor, without the look of glued-on crackerjack-box go-fast accessories, but just sitting in it says its still all about performance. It has an excellent driver’s seat, short-throw six-speed shift, and no-nonsense interior trim. The high-revving 305-horse engine and purposeful handling doesn’t bely that initial impression either, though the clutch is quite heavy by current standards. As a competitive track car with boulevard good looks, it will make performance-oriented owners quite happy, but anyone expecting to relax, physically or mentally, when driving this hot five-door should be warned to look elsewhere.

Mazda discovered the modern small sports car market before anyone else, so it’s no wonder that they can produce the best of the genre with the Miata and the RX8. Best in the under-$40k price range is where we rate the RX8. The outside look of the 2009 version is a clean combination of forceful and graceful, like a champion gymnast, and the interior is even better. Opening the suicide doors affords the full effect of the Cosmo Red and gray interior, in harmony with the Metropolitan grey exterior, This attractive color and trim combination is exclusive to the “40th Anniversary Edition” we were driving.

Sitting in the snugly bolstered seat, with the short six-speed shift knob right under the right hand, an enthusiast is in performance heaven even before firing up the free-revving 232-horspower rotary engine. Other cars in this range might be slightly faster off the line, but in the hands of a good driver the overall performance capability of the RX8 produces quite competitive lap times, and at the end of the day, those other cars will still be unattractive. The Wankel engine is only rated for 16 city and 22 highway miles per gallon, which is the lowest in the group, but only by a mile or so, so even the car’s weak points aren’t that bad.

Stretched five inches compared to its predecessor, the second generation TT looks much more like a poised cheeetah and much less like a fast turtle, which is all to the good. On the other hand, it sports the oversized new signature Audi grille, which must make even some died-in-the-wool Audi fans unhappy under their anything’s-better-than-BMW veneer.

But not to worry, the interior of the TT is far and away more stylish, and yet just as performance focused, as the Bimmers. Just plan on sitting low in the saddle under that rakish roofline, especially if you’re tracking the car wearing a driving helmet.
On the track, there are a lot of things to like, including the driving position, ergonomics of gearshift, gauges, and controls, and quick, responsive handling. But, though fun to drive, with 250 horsepower in a 3000 pound car, the TT is outgunned by all but the RX8 in our sample, so it wouldn’t make our short list of potential track day cars. If you do buy one, be sure to elect the magnetic ride suspension option that allows you to soften the suspension. Without it, the ride on typical streets and roads is just too harsh for most passengers to put up with for long.

This special edition of the aging 350Z definitely gets the award for the car most likely to attract the attention of the highway patrol, with its lowered stance, 18/19 inch wheels, enormous rear spoiler, and paint-bucket-sized dual exhausts. Even flowing with traffic, you’d be the one cut out of the herd by the flashing lights.

At least you could take comfort in the interior while you waited for your license and registration to be checked. The gauges, controls, pedals, soft trim of the Nismo Z are quite attractive while still very functional. The driving position – with the short shift lever and even a knee bolster for your accelerator leg – is excellent for enthusiastic driving.

On-track performance is every bit as satisfying as the appearance would suggest. Unlike many other manufacturers, Nissan didn’t hitch up more horses when it built this track wagon; instead the tuners beefed up the brakes, stiffened the body, and upgraded the shock absorbers and sway bars. This Z is absolutely fierce in the corners.

Not that we’re complaining about the power. Rated at 300 horsepower and 3350 pounds, power to weight is competitive with most everything in this price range, and the sound out of those huge tail pipes is very satisfying.

Unfortunately, this all comes at a price beyond the roughly $40,000 MSRP. Off the track, over any stretch of bumpy road, the car just pummels its occupants. Let’s hope that all those suspension upgrades are adjustable.

Words and photos by Gary Anderson

    Print This Post

New car price quote

Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.
 
 

05/07, 7:24 PM

posted by:

sportmode

no 1 series? Even a 128 would be competitive in this crowd. They did right w/ the mazda in 1st however.

05/07, 7:57 PM

posted by:

GIUGIK1

yeah, no. where’s the MazdaSpeed 3?

05/07, 7:59 PM

posted by:

audi-lover

how dare they **** with the TT! And saying that it doesn’t even compare with mini is BULL ****- every car in this review kicks the ass of what ever BMW and mini have to offer!

Anyway I KNOW that the Audi TTS is far better than any in its class with a 5 second 0-60 time, amazing styling, great handling and great mpg

05/07, 8:40 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

Yeah “sport compacts”??? 350Z, RX8, Audi TT??? Am I missing something here? I was so considering getting a RX8 for my next ride, but the crappy gas mileage, low end torque, and oil thirsty Wankel rotary just don’t do it for me. Other than that I’d love to drive one of these on a track.

05/07, 8:50 PM

posted by:

johnnycanuck

350Z probably shouldn’t even be in this group, but if they forced me to choose that’d be the one. Still a good looking car even if it is near the end of its shelf life. And I kind of like being pummeled. Those of you who have been married for a while will understand.

05/07, 9:16 PM

posted by:

Veda

The Evo GS-R is already out? I thought they’re not for sale yet.

05/07, 11:24 PM

posted by:

02WRXPSM

Anyone who would rate the Mazda RX-8 1st hasn’t been in one on the highway, downshifted from fifth to fourth to pass someone and experienced the strange sinking sensation of having the revs hit the roof and yet going no faster — I was driving a friend’s 07 RX-8 and I got VTECed by a Honda Odyssey (yes, a minivan) on a highway entrance. Foot flat to the floor, and the minivan was walking away.

I agree on the TT as well, a great looking car with no guts whatsoever. Audi has a problem with building heavy, heavy cars; even the A4 and A6 are badly handicapped by their weight.

05/07, 11:39 PM

posted by:

hateful83

02WRXPSM, vtec’d by an Odyssey, awesome, and yet sad at the same time. They need to figure out a way to fit a turbo on the RX-8.

05/08, 12:23 AM

posted by:

GS400

Audilover: Audi TT-S doesn’t do 60mph in 5 seconds. It has teh same crappy engine found in the A4. And A4 is the slowest car in its class–getting the **** kicked out of it by 330/335i, G35/37, IS350, TL/S, C350, etc.
Worse, the TT-S gets its ass handed to it in handling by other better cars in its class, like Z4, S2000, 350Z, etc.
Audi definitiely looks the best, but get a grip on reality. Audis are slow.

05/08, 6:32 AM

posted by:

mayer_ray_nagin

Since when is anyone at LLN considered a journalist?

05/08, 8:07 AM

posted by:

JohnnyBlazE

Audilover, it’s hard to say BMW is crap, even if, like me, you hate them… I hate new ones usually, but I own an oldschool one.

I’m a big audi fan though, right from the oldschool quattro which won me over originally…

However, BMW are in no way crap. They’ve acheived a lot and the M3 isn’t slow, neither is the M5 and M6…

05/08, 8:56 AM

posted by:

Fletch

The STI is the cheapest, easiest and most reliable of these cars to modify and be around 400hp.

The EVO IX was easily modified also, the EVO X with the DCT creates some tuning problems.

05/08, 9:35 AM

posted by:

non_biased_enthusiast

The caption says Audi TT 3.2, but then they say with only 200HP.

05/08, 10:04 AM

posted by:

novem777us

I stopped reading this artice after the evolution errors that were present. There is not an evo RS in the US. That is the GSR
The gsr with ” spooky-fast shifts ” is actually the MR model,which is not out in the US as of yet. Makes me wonder if this Western Automotive Journalists day way what some others might call ” BS ” ….

Novem

05/08, 10:08 AM

posted by:

Z06ified

It’s amazing how none of these cars can get as good fuel economy as the 436hp Corvette with its 6.2L V-8, even with engines smaller than 1/3rd its displacement and signficantly less horsepower.

05/08, 10:40 AM

posted by:

xyunya

You guys are tough on the staff: writing on all 4s is difficult.

05/08, 11:03 AM

posted by:

A4

Why didnt they have the R32… especially over the TT?

05/08, 11:04 AM

posted by:

A4

and yeah which TT is it? 2.0t or 3.2?

05/08, 11:08 AM

posted by:

jumpoffit

what no cobalt? caliber? wait is the caliber a car? or what about the Civic Si? if there was an Rx-8 or even the 350z, what about the Sky? or even the Solstice? looks like this was bash on foreign compacts day aside from the Civic and a few Mazda’s not there

05/08, 12:13 PM

posted by:

A4

cobalt? civic? are you stupid? they arent even in the same class.

05/08, 12:32 PM

posted by:

jumpoffit

oh you’re right- i’m stupid :( – lemme go cry my e-tears now
i did forget about the 30k plus price tag they mentioned, so i should have said S2K – there you happy now ****gobbler

05/08, 12:44 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

Yeah A4, but are the Lancer GSR cough (MR), RX8, and Audi in the same class?

I

05/08, 1:38 PM

posted by:

F3INT))AP3X

No they are not the RX8 and the TT are both cars that I am very fond of, however the Evo trumps them in every way possible except for interior quality. The Evo has 4 doors and a decent trunk and it still outperforms those 2 cars in acceleration and cornering I don’t care what these LL guys say go read any real performance review on the new Evo and you will see why.

05/08, 3:03 PM

posted by:

jpruden

A4… with 200 hp, it’s the 2.0.

I wonder why they didn’t do the TT-S, which has a 265 hp version of the 2.0. Less weight, more grunt.

05/08, 3:23 PM

posted by:

Need4SSpeed

^ My guess is that its price exceeds the 40k mark, although the Nissan 350Z did.

05/08, 6:54 PM

posted by:

C6Racer

Are you ****ing serious I missed it again? I ****in live in Monterey.

05/09, 12:15 AM

posted by:

ResponseGenie

WAJ, who edits your material? Evo X in your log mispelled (GR-S). You claim the tranny for MR is wave of future for all sports cars but wouldn’t cough up the $$ as you list cars in the $40k?!? STI interior in my opinion just as lame as Evo’s, take an unbiased approach like a true journalist no matter who’s NAME is on the track your using! RX-8 is a looker that’s about it…List track times next time they would give better journalism results than biased words!!!

05/10, 9:44 PM

posted by:

jayjc08

I’m a little confused about the EVO. Magazines and Mitsubishi have advertised the car before with 400 horsepower, and a lot quicker than any of these vehicles. Same goes for the Subaru. I understand they have the FQ in Europe, but it’s confusing the different numbers they post.

I think the new one has lost it’s roots, just a little bit. Figuring it’s gained about 800 pounds over the past 15 years, and grown immensely in terms of size.

01/04, 3:19 AM

posted by:

prelude4life

my design observations go as this:
1. Evo rear-ugly
2. WRX- entire car ugly
3. RX-8 – ready for a revamp
4. TT- new design is great
5. NISMO 350Z- tuner design thats track ready

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel