




<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Way Forward&#8221; will be bold, but not fast</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html</link>
	<description>Car news, reviews, and specs for the auto-industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-277110</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-277110</guid>
		<description>an F-50 sounds like either shit or a ferrari though, so i rule that out</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>an F-50 sounds like either shit or a ferrari though, so i rule that out</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 1c3d0g</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-277085</link>
		<dc:creator>1c3d0g</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 13:26:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-277085</guid>
		<description>A4: Nah, I think they&#039;ll brand it as an F-50 or so, since an F-100 is too similar to the F-150. Good points all around, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A4: Nah, I think they&#8217;ll brand it as an F-50 or so, since an F-100 is too similar to the F-150. Good points all around, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertical</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-277071</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-277071</guid>
		<description>This story gives me hope.  I was wondering if Ford considered the new chrome on grills to be the &quot;bold&quot; designs they have been touting.  It&#039;s nice to know it&#039;s not.  I&#039;m looking forward to the car show next January.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This story gives me hope.  I was wondering if Ford considered the new chrome on grills to be the &#8220;bold&#8221; designs they have been touting.  It&#8217;s nice to know it&#8217;s not.  I&#8217;m looking forward to the car show next January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vertical</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-277070</link>
		<dc:creator>Vertical</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 12:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-277070</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s nice to see nothing but intelligent comments so far on this one.  

I agree with Ford not rushing something new to market.  As quickly as possible while doing it right, definitely.  But doing it right is key.  Rushing something out only to have it be a lemon would do serious damage to Ford.

You guys are right about Ranger - it needs an update bad.  Rangers are great trucks, but they are outdated, and have become a little small in the current market.  Something slightly bigger, and more modern looking would be nice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s nice to see nothing but intelligent comments so far on this one.  </p>
<p>I agree with Ford not rushing something new to market.  As quickly as possible while doing it right, definitely.  But doing it right is key.  Rushing something out only to have it be a lemon would do serious damage to Ford.</p>
<p>You guys are right about Ranger &#8211; it needs an update bad.  Rangers are great trucks, but they are outdated, and have become a little small in the current market.  Something slightly bigger, and more modern looking would be nice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276976</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 20:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276976</guid>
		<description>i dont think we get them because they were mostly developed after the american versions, and it would be too costly and unprofitable for Ford to import them at this point. at least thats the excuse ive heard so far. it makes sense for all future models to come into line with the EU models, so hopefully that is their &quot;way forward&quot; plan. With all the publicity of the new mondeo in the new James Bond film, it would only make sense for them to be bringing it to the states, considering the marketing move they made with that. its a little late for the ranger.. but i say they resurrect the F-100 name from days ago for an all new small pickup. F-series have been forever connected to Fords main successes, and adding a smaller F-series as a replacement would make sense. The ranger is dead, and they cant compete in the marketplace with no small pickup.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i dont think we get them because they were mostly developed after the american versions, and it would be too costly and unprofitable for Ford to import them at this point. at least thats the excuse ive heard so far. it makes sense for all future models to come into line with the EU models, so hopefully that is their &#8220;way forward&#8221; plan. With all the publicity of the new mondeo in the new James Bond film, it would only make sense for them to be bringing it to the states, considering the marketing move they made with that. its a little late for the ranger.. but i say they resurrect the F-100 name from days ago for an all new small pickup. F-series have been forever connected to Fords main successes, and adding a smaller F-series as a replacement would make sense. The ranger is dead, and they cant compete in the marketplace with no small pickup.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BAMF</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276972</link>
		<dc:creator>BAMF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276972</guid>
		<description>Yeah, what is the problem? Why DONT we get those cars? I&#039;d really like to hear an explanation from Ford. Perhaps its because Ford doesn&#039;t think their Europe cars are &quot;Bold&quot; enough for the States-- Its possible, considering that the Europe cars have an understated look. This is probably a result of Ford having a better reputation over there, so they don&#039;t have as much to prove. Maybe Ford thinks that if they bring those cars over, people wont buy them because they aren&#039;t exciting enough. I hope thats what it is, because that means we&#039;re going to be getting better, more exciting cars than Ford Europe, which would be a welcome improvement, as far as I&#039;m concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, what is the problem? Why DONT we get those cars? I&#8217;d really like to hear an explanation from Ford. Perhaps its because Ford doesn&#8217;t think their Europe cars are &#8220;Bold&#8221; enough for the States&#8211; Its possible, considering that the Europe cars have an understated look. This is probably a result of Ford having a better reputation over there, so they don&#8217;t have as much to prove. Maybe Ford thinks that if they bring those cars over, people wont buy them because they aren&#8217;t exciting enough. I hope thats what it is, because that means we&#8217;re going to be getting better, more exciting cars than Ford Europe, which would be a welcome improvement, as far as I&#8217;m concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lanapat7</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276968</link>
		<dc:creator>lanapat7</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276968</guid>
		<description>They are now pondering what to do.  GM went through this process about 2.5-3 years ago.  GM decided to bring cars from other countries when the Aveo was a hit.
Ford&#039;s experience with the Merkur, Capri, Fiesta was not good and I think they still reject this option.  But I agree this is the fastest and safest way to introduce new product to the USA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are now pondering what to do.  GM went through this process about 2.5-3 years ago.  GM decided to bring cars from other countries when the Aveo was a hit.<br />
Ford&#8217;s experience with the Merkur, Capri, Fiesta was not good and I think they still reject this option.  But I agree this is the fastest and safest way to introduce new product to the USA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeFX</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276963</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeFX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 19:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276963</guid>
		<description>The scary part is Ford has not even shown any sketches ot let us believe that there truly is new stuff in the works (aside from the Fairlane, which is hardly groundbreaking).  GM is rolling out all kinds of new vehicles, concept cars and design sketches.  You may not like all of them, but it at least confirms the company has a pulse!

And it truly is frustrating to see what Europe is getting.  If we don&#039;t get that new Mondeo, even as a Mercury, then all hope is lost.  We all complain about it on this site, but does anybody have any idea why we don&#039;t get those cars?  Safety regs?  Unions?  US design team afraid of losing their jobs?  Seriously, what&#039;s the problem?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scary part is Ford has not even shown any sketches ot let us believe that there truly is new stuff in the works (aside from the Fairlane, which is hardly groundbreaking).  GM is rolling out all kinds of new vehicles, concept cars and design sketches.  You may not like all of them, but it at least confirms the company has a pulse!</p>
<p>And it truly is frustrating to see what Europe is getting.  If we don&#8217;t get that new Mondeo, even as a Mercury, then all hope is lost.  We all complain about it on this site, but does anybody have any idea why we don&#8217;t get those cars?  Safety regs?  Unions?  US design team afraid of losing their jobs?  Seriously, what&#8217;s the problem?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bepsf</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276956</link>
		<dc:creator>bepsf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276956</guid>
		<description>Give me a break---

They already have most of the product available that they need, they just refuse to bring it over to the states from Europe (Ka, Fiesta, Focus II, Focus Cabriolet, Focus S-Max) &amp; Australia (Falcon Ute, Territory) - and have virtually given up the small pickup parket by allowing Ranger to wither on the vine without a meaningful update in 14 years - Ford of Thailand has a newer/better Ranger pickup than we do here!

More evidence of Ford management doing what they do best:  Dragging their feet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Give me a break&#8212;</p>
<p>They already have most of the product available that they need, they just refuse to bring it over to the states from Europe (Ka, Fiesta, Focus II, Focus Cabriolet, Focus S-Max) &amp; Australia (Falcon Ute, Territory) &#8211; and have virtually given up the small pickup parket by allowing Ranger to wither on the vine without a meaningful update in 14 years &#8211; Ford of Thailand has a newer/better Ranger pickup than we do here!</p>
<p>More evidence of Ford management doing what they do best:  Dragging their feet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A4</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276955</link>
		<dc:creator>A4</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276955</guid>
		<description>theyll be eating their own shit before we get a good product. CANT WAIT FOR THE FOCUS UPDATE! YAY! not</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>theyll be eating their own shit before we get a good product. CANT WAIT FOR THE FOCUS UPDATE! YAY! not</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris C.</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276953</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:42:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276953</guid>
		<description>Bold but not fast. What is constipation?

Seriously, they need fast at least from what I&#039;ve read here and other places.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bold but not fast. What is constipation?</p>
<p>Seriously, they need fast at least from what I&#8217;ve read here and other places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fatstrat</title>
		<link>http://www.leftlanenews.com/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast.html#comment-276943</link>
		<dc:creator>Fatstrat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 18:11:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leftlanenews.com/2006/10/17/way-forward-will-be-bold-but-not-fast/#comment-276943</guid>
		<description>Intelligent strategy. They aren&#039;t and shouldn&#039;t be panicking.
Beats the &#039;Ready Fire Aim&#039; strategy of some companies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Intelligent strategy. They aren&#8217;t and shouldn&#8217;t be panicking.<br />
Beats the &#8216;Ready Fire Aim&#8217; strategy of some companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 287/288 objects using memcached

Served from: www.leftlanenews.com @ 2012-02-10 16:41:26 -->
