General Motors may be in talks with Renault and Nissan about an alliance, but the Wall Street Journal thinks it should be talking to Ford about a full-blown merger. “Now is the time for their conservative minds to consider something truly transformational: a merger of General Motors and Ford,” the paper suggested. Taking the Journal’s idea, Detroit’s Local 4 suggests cutting Buick, Pontiac and Mercury would allow the major company to focus on better-selling brands. But not everyone thinks the idea is a smart one. “This is one of those instances where 1 plus 1 equals 1.2,” explained UAW President Ron Gettelfinger. AMCI auto analyst Jim Sanfilippo said the idea shows a lack of understanding of the industry. “Gee why doesn’t the last-place team buy a couple of Yankees and everything would be fine. It’s just not a realistic scenario,” said Sanfilippo.
Zero obligation price quote from a trusted local dealer.



07/18, 8:56 AM
posted by:
6ix
Having been in a company that was Number 1 in the industry (major sports good company), that then bought Number 2 (the major competitor,) I can tell ya that 1 + 1 does NOT equal 2. More like 0.7.
Bad idea.
07/18, 9:06 AM
posted by:
Renton
The blind leading the blind, a selling to the retarded.
07/18, 9:20 AM
posted by:
Brian
That would be like blasphemy, or something. I’m a GM fan, not a Ford fan, so I don’t want to see this happen.
07/18, 9:26 AM
posted by:
Never work
Never work. They’re too different companies. Plus, you’ll piss off all of the red states (half are GM, half are Ford, all are loyal to only one). Of course, the blue states won’t mind seeing as they all have stopped buying from either company LONG ago.
07/18, 9:30 AM
posted by:
GMrules
GM neds to run Ford out of business. They offer nothing to the General but more manpower and plant capacity. There is ont one vehicle that Ford could offer that GM doesn’t already excel in. BTW, I’d say the same about a merger with Nissan or Toyota.
07/18, 9:32 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
You guys act like the Americans should be competing with the Americans. There are bigger fish to fry and maybe it can be done with alittle help from this side of the shore. I think this is a great idea.
Or we can always have them merge with the japanese(nissan) so then everybody thinks that we can ONLY develop great cars with their help.
07/18, 9:33 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
…think outside the box.
^LOL
07/18, 9:42 AM
posted by:
JD
It would never happen.
07/18, 10:02 AM
posted by:
Andre Neves
Never say never because at the rate they’re both going, they might not be around to make that decision later on.
07/18, 10:13 AM
posted by:
Chris
I like how a UAW president has an opinion on this. Its not the General’s cars that are running it into the ground but the UAW and high health care costs.
07/18, 10:18 AM
posted by:
BAMF
I like Andre’s thoughts on this.
07/18, 10:26 AM
posted by:
1c3d0g
Yeah, high health care costs is *the* problem that brought this whole market down. Damn insurance companies.
07/18, 10:28 AM
posted by:
GMrules
Ford could stand to learn a thing or 2 (or a million) from the General
07/18, 10:49 AM
posted by:
Heydn
Anything is possible. But not everything is a good idea
07/18, 11:03 AM
posted by:
Jon'O
I can’t think of a poorer solution to GM and Fords problems. They both need to streamline their offerings and shrink their infrastructure. That task will be even more difficult if they join forces. On a similar note, I think it’s very shortsighted of Chrysler to further overlap their Dodge, Jeep, and Chrysler offerings. They are doing exactly what GM and Ford are trying to undo. Is no one paying attention?
07/18, 11:43 AM
posted by:
Jack
GM currently rolls about $2,000 into the price of every car they sell to pay the pensions and benefits of their current and former employees. Fold Ford into the mix and that number would rise dramatically given the number of people who wold lose their jobs in the merger. This would make two already weak competitors in the marketplace even weaker. And can you imagine the mind numbing mediocrity that would ensue?
07/18, 12:28 PM
posted by:
Madcapp
I want a Ford Camaro, or a Chevrolet Crown Victoria.
07/18, 12:33 PM
posted by:
bingethinker
Back when GM and Ford vehicles were selling well, those pension and benefits costs weren’t a problem. They need to stop bean-counting and put out some vehicles that people want to buy.
Didn’t they read the contracts, and do the math before they signed them? They must have known they’d be paying out $2,000 a car for pension and benefits. I can only conclude they were planning to screw their employees out of that money in the name of staying “competitive.”
07/18, 1:21 PM
posted by:
Peter
Never gonna happen, IMO. That would be a little wierd. And GMrules, you somehow continue to piss me off, even though I’m a GM fan too!
07/18, 1:26 PM
posted by:
Piablo
Anytime an investor says it’s a great idea, my ears perk up to attention. Because all that means is a greater return for them. And most of the time that means more $$$ out of our pockets, that is we the customers.
Basic law of economics, more choice is better.
Honestly, I would break GM up. That is my pie in the sky idea. If all of GM’s brands are relevant, then break them up. We’ll see which ones are relevant and which ones are not when some of them go out of business. The worse thing to ever happen to the automotive world is when Ford and GM went and bought up all of the world’s brands. All it did was diminish competition and make the marketplace less desireable for customers. breaking the companies up lets the marketplace operate in a more natural manner where the strong survive and the weak companies fail. What we have now is a market that is continually trying to self medicate which only gives us a broken down, almost bankrupt GM.
07/18, 2:28 PM
posted by:
mindas
it would be nonsense, two bad companies merge and you’ll get one big bad company
07/18, 2:34 PM
posted by:
2006300C
The bean counters got these companies into trouble and they will not get them out, only good product will save them, and the government should pick up some of the legacy costs as a sort of bail out.
07/18, 2:43 PM
posted by:
Kaptain75329
Jon’O (#15) : [I]They both need to streamline their offerings and shrink their infrastructure.[/i]
This is precisely what I was thinking – couldn’t have put it better myself. Both have too much of a problem where some of their brands are diluted because they are rebadged offerings. The market sees the shortcuts and it doesn’t like it. (More excusable on the imports because at least the cars and brands are different enough and clearly defined to their target audiences.) A merger between GM & Ford is the very worst thing that could happen to either of them.
Been a GM man here for a long time on account of Saturn, but the ION’s fit and finish (rather lack thereof – mismatched panels, squeaks and rattles before 500 miles) and exceedingly poor handling (entirely too much body roll, dangerous lack of grip in even moderate concerning) led me to get rid of it after only 3 months of ownership. Nothing else in GM’s lineup was worth my money. I would have switched to Ford directly had I been able to purchase a C1 (Euro) Focus in the states, but Ford’s incredibly brain-dead decision to sell it everywhere but here made that impossible. Ultimately, I selected a Mazda 3s Touring because it was the car that best met my needs and wants for looks, content, power, handling, and safety.
I wish the domestic auto execs would pay attention to these issues – the bulk of their customer base takes these same factors into account, so it’s no wonder GM and Ford are where they are now. Bad and unfair press is a factor too, but that doesn’t explain everything. For the most part, I think they’re getting the hint though, and I suspect we won’t recognize Ford & GM of the very near tomorrow, which can only be good for us, and ultimately, them.
07/18, 2:51 PM
posted by:
gonewiththewind
“General Ford” sounds very interesting.
07/18, 3:10 PM
posted by:
stuart
More like a pornstar lol
07/18, 3:15 PM
posted by:
stuart
Its pointless ford will only benefit by gaining chevrolet
07/18, 3:18 PM
posted by:
stuart
Don’t forget to cut Hummer and Lincoln
Then sell Jaguar, Cadillac, Saab and Mazda
07/18, 3:42 PM
posted by:
Ahk-Med
“and the government should pick up some of the legacy costs as a sort of bail out.”
Not with my tax dollars.
07/18, 3:57 PM
posted by:
Justin
This will never happen!.. 2 of the biggest rivals coming together.. ya right!… whos the idiot who came up with this “birght” idea!?
07/18, 5:42 PM
posted by:
Jason Parry
no.
07/18, 6:01 PM
posted by:
your name (required)
Ford and GM are finally gettin along, lol. Meanwhile Dr.Z is standing on the sidelines laughing his ass off! LOL!!!!
07/18, 10:40 PM
posted by:
nist777
GM + Ford = Microsoft of the auto industry = Huge antitrust battle
As an American, I want as much competition as possible (ie, breaking up GM) so that I know I am getting the best quality at the best prices.
Have communists infiltrated the Wall Street Journal?
07/19, 1:23 AM
posted by:
BMW850
you start with crap and you add crap you will end up with crap
07/19, 7:33 AM
posted by:
JohnnyBlazE
Ford and GM NEED to be seperate entities or they’d have died out long ago… competition with each other drives them… see australia!
07/19, 9:08 AM
posted by:
Fleming in Tennessee
Two of the worlds largest railroads merged (New York Central and Pennsylvania RR) and became one of the largest corporate failures in history shortly thereafter. At one time, the PRR was the worlds largest corporation. Same thing here! Will never work. American auto companies created Americas middle class.
07/19, 5:42 PM
posted by:
dan
@flemming in tenn.
“american auto companies createad americas middle class”
hm since middle class is dissappearing i guess the american auto industry is going to disappear as well…. so i guess it makes sense
07/20, 2:28 AM
posted by:
Darren
no way! 2 diff companies
GM now has chevy,pontiac,Buick,cadillac,GMC,SAAB,Hummer & saturn.
& they just decide to keep all 8 brands!?
pontiac & chevy/GMC – most cars/truck are same, only diff grille. Buick, they make this as Lexus competitors. cadillac competes lincoln/chrysler. SAAB & Hummer, only few dealers left. SAAB is improving, but Lexus,infiniti,acura is better choice & volvo/BMW/Benz/Audi/Jaguar/LandRover etc & saturn(american opel) so who will buy GM?
Ford just now advertising bold moves, but…
they still keep its 6yrs old focus & europe,HK & china has new one & 07 just new 3 bar grille, rumors said maybe 2009. I hope so!@
Fairlane replaces slow selling freestar, but looks like LandRover, even Ford owns LandRover.
Freestyle,500,Explorer etc not selling, other brands, better choices
Lincoln, retro luxury, but why spends more from Ford?
Ford/Lincoln can do the same things as Toyota/Lexus by offering products as them/Honda/Acura & nissan/Infiniti.
07/20, 2:14 PM
posted by:
Jordan
GM and Hyundai should merge. They would make a good couple!