11/15/2006, 11:19 AM

Volkswagen News

Volkswagen unveils high-performance Passat R36

Volkswagen today unveiled the much-anticipated Passat R36 — a high performance variant of the popular sedan and wagon. The 296 horsepower R36 features a DSG transmission and 4Motion all-wheel-drive.

Zero to 62 mph takes 5.6 seconds for the sedan and 5.8 seconds for the wagon, thanks to a power 3.6 liter FSI engine. The cars have a top speed of 155 mph.

The R36 will be on display at the Essen Motor Show in Germany, taking place December 1 to 10. For a look at both the wagon and sedan, have a look at our gallery after the jump…

 
 

11/15, 11:24 AM

posted by:

YourNameHere

i have a wagon please.

11/15, 11:27 AM

posted by:

Renton

Very Cool.

Just don’t price it too high.

11/15, 11:31 AM

posted by:

Brendino

Not so sure about that interior…
but the numbers are good!

11/15, 11:35 AM

posted by:

Ricardo Head

Didn’t VW do a high performance Passat a few years back only to find out the hard way that nobody is interested in a high performance Passat?

11/15, 11:36 AM

posted by:

kellyp

where is the big wing?

11/15, 11:59 AM

posted by:

savedsol

Exactly Ricardo, just don’t price it at $38K like the old W8.

11/15, 12:16 PM

posted by:

AdamT

A4 should LOVE this… =D

11/15, 12:23 PM

posted by:

pirelli

The wheels are a little plain.

11/15, 12:25 PM

posted by:

eam3

Beautiful car, but…

If you go to http://www.vw.com and build a current Passat 3.6 with the options that would be required to build a “sporty Passat” you would check off: sport package, bi-xenon lights and the optional stereo. Guess what? You’re already at $36,570.

That’s without navigation, adaptive cruise control, rear side airbags or the boy racer ground effects kit. If you did add these options then you’d be looking at $41,345!

How much will they price this R36 at?

11/15, 12:36 PM

posted by:

ehhh?

A 16hp bump is not that much, and the price will be very expensive. But does 16hp really account for a .4 second drop from 0-60 (msn has the 3.6 wagon at 6.24s)? Because unless they dropped some of the wieght (considering it doesnt go up, which is a very distinct possibility) that doesnt seem sound. Or maybe it is, I dont know that much. Either way I dont see this car selling too much, but I feel it may do better than some of you make it out to be.

11/15, 12:49 PM

posted by:

joseph

Exactly eam3! This looks nice and simple…..but the current one is already WAY overpriced when you consider the competition. Isn’t that what Audi is for???

11/15, 1:00 PM

posted by:

cknoff

It’s nice that VW doesn’t borrow design cues from Audi. NOT!

11/15, 1:03 PM

posted by:

eam3

VW management has major Audi-envy going on and they seem to have forgotten their place in the marketplace. When I bought my Corrado back in 1990 I paid $15,900 (sticker was just shy of $20K) brand new because they were not selling very well. Imagine if the Corrado would have cost the same as the Audi Coupe they were selling at the same time, chances are extremely good that I would have gone with the Audi instead.

The point of that story is to illustrate that when you’re talking about serious money (over $35K for most people), then people would rather buy a more upscale, prestigious Audi than a Volkswagen. I can understand VW’s desire to be taken more seriously but what’s the point? They already own Audi, why compete against their own make?

11/15, 1:17 PM

posted by:

Don

looks like the interior will blind you on a sunny day

11/15, 2:03 PM

posted by:

A non E Moose

Very nice looking, but I bet they price it too high, which seems to be the trend with VW of late. W8 anyone?

11/15, 2:29 PM

posted by:

Bonquisha's Back

That interior is so hot!!!! Get you your redneck assess in a Dodge Crappy Caliber and tell me this interior is no good.

11/15, 2:48 PM

posted by:

Ricardo Head

Hell, a Chevy Aveo has a hot interior compared to a Dodge Crappy Caliber.

11/15, 2:51 PM

posted by:

megator

ehh, ever heard of gearing? if the gears are slightly lower the car can accelerate faster. also did you look at the diference in torque?

11/15, 2:56 PM

posted by:

jrusoff

The key thing I want is AWD. Give me DSG, the 2.0T engine and AWD for under 30K and I buy it. Any higher price and I might as well buy an Audi.
JR

11/15, 3:23 PM

posted by:

1c3d0g

Not a fan of the styling, but the performance is extremely good. Great job VW!

11/15, 3:39 PM

posted by:

meanpants555

eam3 that is one of Volkswagen’s problems. They have multiple cars in the same class competing against each other. Skoda, SEAT, VW and Audi overlap in many sectors; its platform sharing taking to the hilt.

The dash is hideous; that turned aluminum looks nappy on a Bentley let alone a Passat. I do like the seats though.

11/15, 3:55 PM

posted by:

Ricardo Head

I actually like the aluminum/metal look on a dash, but really, what is so inspring on that dash design? Nothing … it is tried and true standard Vdub crap, nothing unusual, nothing of interest, and if it were in a Ford Fusion (which it almost is) people would say it is more boring Ford/domestic garbage and we need to learn from the foreigners.

11/15, 5:11 PM

posted by:

A4

i do love it

11/15, 5:12 PM

posted by:

A4

needs a stick shift though

11/15, 6:21 PM

posted by:

nowei

I very much agree that this is yet another example of the VW Group building a car that competes almost exclusively with another car built by the VW Group.

What I really do find most interesting, as Ricardo Head pointed out, is that this is another performance Passat–something VW already tried and then admitted was a bad idea (from a marketing standpoint, that is).

Does anybody else feel like we maybe haven’t seen the last of the Phaeton?

/no

11/15, 6:31 PM

posted by:

A4

no, VW built the Passat W8 which was very poorly marketed, and was essentially a discreet trim level. This on the other hand continues the R32’s legacy, in a more upscale passat than before, probably for around the same price, if not less than what the W8 cost. People respond to the R-marketing, and understand they are the best VW’s they have to offer (dont say the lamborghini), while the W8 was just a motor upgrade with quad tailpipes, sharper rims, and HID’s. This will certainly be more successful, especially since im sure VW is going to make it “limited run” from the outset, just like the R32, rather than the W8’s regular production schedule.

11/15, 6:33 PM

posted by:

A4

bottom line is this car is way more sport oriented than the W8 ever was.

11/15, 7:03 PM

posted by:

LamborghiniZ

Ricardo, the W8 Passat wasn’t a “high performance” Passat per se, just like the W12 Audi A8 isn’t high performance compared to the S8, you see the S8, just like the R36, is geared towards high performance sporty driving, while the W8 Passat just like the W12 A8 is more powerful than the standard Passat and A8 but aren’t really high performance machines.

11/15, 9:25 PM

posted by:

DavidS

Lamborghini has it right. W8 had a larger motor but was not oriented toward the enthusiast, just someone who wanted a higher-end Passat.
Somewhat-comparable example: the person who would chose this car is someone who would take a CL55 AMG with the V8 over the CL600 with the V12 and the same horsepower. In any case, Lamborghini’s nailed it.

And I’m not sure that there’s a negative to it competing with Audi. Sure, it could be less expensive (G35x, anyone?), but the target audience for this car will always chose this over a base 3.2 A6 regardless of badge.

Coulda put a turbo in there though…

AWD all the way.

11/15, 9:36 PM

posted by:

LamborghiniZ

Foster, I was clearly drawing a parallel between the A8 W12/S8 and the Passat W8/R36, I believe I was pretty clear and DavidS understood me.

11/16, 12:11 AM

posted by:

SSTRFSTR

The W8 with sport package and 6MT was geared towards enthusiasts — that’s why no one bought it. :)

11/16, 5:03 AM

posted by:

MM

Nice car, however at the price at which it will be sold there are better choices out there, such as the newly unveiled BMW 335xi.

11/16, 8:56 AM

posted by:

Saud

Very nice but no one’s gonna sue vw for giving it a black out griil in the front rather than a gaudy chrome grill. Atleast make it an option.

11/16, 10:03 AM

posted by:

Wickedated

0-60 in 5.6secs in hardly impressive. For the money, get the S4 and have real muscle

11/16, 5:08 PM

posted by:

SSTRFSTR

Make a S4 with DSG instead of a tranditional slushbox and then we’ll talk…

11/16, 10:12 PM

posted by:

LamborghiniZ

SSTRFSTR, but it still wasn’t a performance enthusiast car like this R36, you have to admit that, it was nowhere close

11/16, 11:08 PM

posted by:

autonutt

A4 is right.. the W8 was supposed to be an extremely luxurious Passat, something of a stepping stone to the then-upcoming Phaeton, that just happened to have an 8-cylinder engine. The problem with that was the price was WAY too high, and the engine was far from sporting when saddled with the standard AWD and a transmission tuned for smoothness not speed. With the Rabbit and GTI, VW US seems finally to have realized where their niche is supposed to be, and the Passat R36 will be a logical step up for GTI/GLI/R32 owners willing to spend $40-45K for a less-subtle alternative to the Audi A4. Now where’s my Eos R32?

11/17, 8:03 AM

posted by:

Renton

Passat W8 was an interesting car. I tried to convince my GF to get one, but she was not biting. She wanted an A6 3.0 quattro.

The W8 was a nicer car to more expensive, less powerful Audi. W8 only came one way…loaded.

It had a great exaust note and it was the only 8 cylinder German sedan on the market for under $40K, possibly $50K as well.

While it was no lightweight, handling machine, it was an effortless cruiser with tons of reserve torque.

The A4 was very blah. Fantastic construction, attractive lines, great winter traction, but actually quite boring. The W8 at least had the big motor feel to it. Now it is gone forever, and I wished I had forced the issue more at the time.

11/17, 5:25 PM

posted by:

SSTRFSTR

Also, I think that if the W8 came from the factory with the Votex areo-kit installed (or at least had painted lower valances), it would have sold much better.
Besides the steep price, the failure of the W8 in the US had nothing to do with the overlapping market share mentioned above (VW vs Audi, etc.), but was entirely due to poor marketing.
Remember the W8 ads? Me niether.

11/18, 12:14 AM

posted by:

LamborghiniZ

Yeah i think you’re right about the marketing SSTRSFSTR

 
 
You need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.

    

Forgot your Password?

Don't have a user name yet? Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the
confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
 
 
 
  • Login
  • About
  • Contact
Please note that you need to log in with your user name and password before you can leave comments.
  

login
cancel
Forgot your Password?
Don't have a user name yet? Click here to register now.

Simply fill in the form below and click the link provided in the confirmation email. You must supply a valid email address to complete the registration process.

  
submit
cancel
Leftlane is the leading source for automotive industry and vehicle news, new car research, future vehicle information, and reviews. Read by car shoppers, driving enthusiasts, autoworkers, executives, and investors, the website is updated throughout the day with the very latest auto news - as it happens.

Leftlane also provides consumers with accurate and media-rich information on every car currently on the market. In-market shoppers can review specs, read overviews, view high-resolution images, watch videos, and estimate pricing. No other automotive publication brings together the same degree of timeliness, thoroughness and accuracy as Leftlane.
 
submit
cancel